The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review on turbulent flow over rough surfaces: Fundamentals and theories
Open accessAbstract
Surface roughness can significantly influence the fluid dynamics and heat transfer in convective flows by inducing perturbations in the velocity profile which affect surface drag, turbulent mixing and heat transfer. While surface roughness can often negatively affect the performance of systems, it can also lead to performance improvements, such as in convective flows where roughness elements have been shown to enhance heat transfer. Turbulent flows over rough surfaces have been studied for about a century leading to significant developments in this field. Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) has made significant contributions to the knowledge of turbulent flows over rough surfaces as well as evaluation of the developed theories. Moreover, the turbulent closures model has seen wide use for simulation of rough-wall turbulent flows in practical applications where DNS is hindered by its complexity and computational resources. Despite a significant number of experimental and CFD studies and the latest advances in this field, a recent review was not available. Therefore, this review surveys the past and recent experimental and numerical studies to address the fundamentals and theories related to the structure of turbulent flows over rough walls. This study chiefly investigates the structure of mean flow profile over rough surfaces, and its correlation with smooth wall mean flow profile. This review study can contribute to prospective experimental and CFD work, and for characterising rough-wall turbulent flows and heat transfer in different academic and engineering applications such as aerodynamics, hydraulics, meteorology, and manufacturing. The review concludes that despite significant progress, the structure of turbulent flow is still not fully understood. This is mainly due to a lack of systematic studies on the structure of turbulent flow and also due to the variety of roughness which influence the dynamics of the flow in the roughness sublayers. The current roughness scale (sand-grain roughness height) fails to completely characterise roughness in many cases. Therefore, there is a need for a universal roughness scale that can describe every type of roughness and be used in any rough-flow regimes, including fully rough and transitionally rough regimes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plasmon induced thermoelectric effect in graphene
Shautsova, V., Sidiropoulos, T., Xiao, X., Güsken, N. A., Black, N. C. G., Gilbertson, A. M., Giannini, V., Maier, S. A., Cohen, L. F., & Oulton, R. F. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07508-z · Cited by 710
Cited by
Data-driven prediction of the equivalent sand-grain roughness
Ma, H., Li, Y., Yang, X., & Ye, L. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-46564-4 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Kadivar, M., Tormey, D., & McGranaghan, G.
- Venue
- International Journal of Thermofluids
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 100077
- ISSN
- 2666-2027 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3135657113
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.