CO2 plume migration and dissolution in layered reservoirs
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations
Kelemen, P., Benson, S. M., Pilorgé, H., Psarras, P., & Wilcox, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2019.00009 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Self-citationTowards a predictor for CO2 plume migration using deep neural networks
Wen, G., Tang, M., & Benson, S. M. (2021) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103223 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Wen, G., & Benson, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wen, Gege
- Venue
- International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 87
- Pages
- 66-79
- ISSN
- 1750-5836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2945736536
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International journal of greenhouse gas control (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Global Climate and Energy Project
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
- Keywords
- CO2 plume migration, CO2 dissolution, layered reservoirs, permeability contrast, permeability heterogeneity, carbon capture and storage, permeability anisotropy, multiphase flow simulation, supercritical carbon dioxide, CO2 storage monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
