Cited by 60Women's cancer prevention and managementCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Involving the community in cervical cancer prevention programs

Agurto, I., Arrossi, S., White, S., Coffey, P., Dzuba, I., Bingham, A., Bradley, J., Lewis, R.·2005·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

Underutilization of cervical cancer prevention services by women in the high‐risk age group of 30–60 years can be attributed to health service factors (such as poor availability, poor accessibility, and poor quality of care provided), to women's lack of information, and to cultural and behavioral barriers. The Alliance for Cervical Cancer Prevention (ACCP) partners have been working to identify effective ways to increase women's voluntary participation in prevention programs by testing strategies of community involvement in developing countries. The ACCP experiences include developing community partnerships to listen to and learn from the community, thereby enhancing appropriateness of services; developing culturally appropriate messages and educational materials; making access to high‐quality screening services easier; and identifying effective ways to encourage women and their partners to complete diagnosis and treatment regimens. Cervical cancer prevention programs that use these strategies are more likely to increase demand, ensure follow‐through for treatment, and ultimately reduce disease burden.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.01.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agurto, I., Arrossi, S., White, S., Coffey, P., Dzuba, I., Bingham, A., Bradley, J., & Lewis, R.
Affiliations
  • World Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas (US)
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (US)
  • EngenderHealth (US)
  • Jhpiego (US)
Corresponding author
Agurto, I.
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03-05
Volume
89
Issue
S2
Pages
S38-45
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W2162445849
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
cervical cancer prevention, community participation, community partnerships, cervical cancer screening, health care access, health service quality, treatment follow-up, developing countries
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Community Health Services, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Kenya, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Compliance, Teaching, Women's Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review