Medical vs. surgical evacuation of first‐trimester spontaneous abortion
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether management of incomplete first‐trimester abortion with vaginal misoprostol in an under‐resourced setting is a viable treatment option. Methods: A total of 94 women were randomized to 600 μg of misoprostol intravaginally or to surgical curettage. The women receiving misoprostol were administered a second dose if the abortion was incomplete; and if still not complete after a week, evacuation of retained products of conception was performed. All women had a follow‐up visit 2 weeks following complete abortion. Results: The overall success rate of medical management was 91.5%, with 15 of 47 successful cases after 1 dose of misoprostol; 8.5% of the 47 women required evacuation of retained products of conception after 1 week because of treatment failure. The success rate in the surgical arm was 100%. Patients in the medical arm had a longer duration of bleeding and a greater need for analgesia. There were no differences in hemoglobin levels, white blood cell count, adverse effects, pain score, and satisfaction with treatment at the follow‐up visit. However, more women who received the medical treatment would recommend it or choose it in the future. Conclusion: Medical management using 600 μg of misoprostol in 2 doses is effective to treat incomplete first‐trimester abortions in an under‐resourced setting when there is no evidence of uterine sepsis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nine randomised controlled trials have compared medical and surgical management of miscarriage.
“Nine randomised controlled trials have compared medical and surgical management.2,8-15”
From Management of miscarriage: expectant, medical, or surgical? Results of randomised controlled trial (miscarriage treatment (MIST) trial) (2006) · cites this paper as [11]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trinder, J., Brocklehurst, P., Porter, R., Read, M., Vyas, S., & Smith, L. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38828.593125.55 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
- Authors
- Moodliar, S., Bagratee, J. S., & Moodley, J.
- Affiliations
- University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Bagratee, J.S.
- ORCID
- Moodley, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-07-26
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-26
- ISSN
- 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
- 0020-7292
- 1879-3479
- OpenAlex
- W1964597775
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Keywords
- first-trimester abortion, incomplete abortion, misoprostol, medical evacuation, surgical curettage, retained products of conception, resource-limited settings, treatment success rate, analgesia, patient satisfaction
- MeSH terms
- Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal, Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Dilatation and Curettage, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Misoprostol
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review