Effects of hormone therapy with estrogen and/or progesterone on sleep pattern in postmenopausal women
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of estrogen and progesterone on sleep in postmenopausal women. METHOD: The 33 participants were randomly assigned to an estrogen or placebo group after undergoing clinical and hormonal assessments and a polysomnogram, and they underwent the same tests again after 12 weeks. Then, while still taking estrogen or placebo, they all received progesterone for another 12 weeks and underwent a final polysomnogram. RESULTS: Estrogen plus progesterone was more effective than estrogen alone in decreasing the prevalence of periodic limb movement (PLM) (8.1% vs 2.8%), hot flashes (14.2% vs 0%), and bruxism (11.1% vs 0%) at night, or somnolence and attention difficulty during the day. The prevalences of breathing irregularities, arousal from sleep, anxiety, and memory impairment were decreased in both groups following progesterone treatment. CONCLUSION: While not significantly affecting sleep quality, hormone therapy decreased the prevalence of arousal in both groups and that of PLM in the group treated with estrogen plus progesterone.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies comparing hormone therapy to placebo have found that hormone therapy improves perceived sleep quality and self-reported sleeping problems more than placebo.
“Although several studies comparing HT to a placebo have found that HT improves perceived sleep quality and self-reported sleeping problems more than a placebo [112-123]”
From Non-Pharmacological Treatment of Insomnia (2012) · cites this paper as [112]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Hachul, H., Bittencourt, L. R. A., Andersen, M. L., Haidar, M. A., Baracat, E. C., & Tufik, S.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Hachul, Helena
- Venue
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09-23
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 207-212
- ISSN
- 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
- 0020-7292
- 1879-3479
- OpenAlex
- W2145628359
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Keywords
- hormone replacement therapy, estrogen, progesterone, sleep quality, postmenopausal women, periodic limb movements, hot flashes, bruxism, sleep arousal, polysomnography, daytime somnolence
- MeSH terms
- Cognition Disorders, Double-Blind Method, Estrogens, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Progestins, Progesterone, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Postmenopause, Hot Flashes, Nocturnal Myoclonus Syndrome, Hormone Replacement Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review