Non‐uptake of colposcopy in a resource‐poor setting
Abstract
Objective: To determine the rate of acceptance/refusal of colposcopy and the reasons for refusal by women referred for the procedure in southeast Nigeria. Methods: An audit was performed of the computerized database for all women referred for colposcopy at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, from August 1, 2009, to July 31, 2010. The characteristics of those who accepted colposcopy were compared with those who refused the procedure. An interviewer‐administered questionnaire was used to assess reasons for refusal and the subsequent treatment chosen. Results: During the study period, 154 women were referred for colposcopy: 103 (66.9%) accepted and 51 (33.1%) refused. Those who refused were younger and tended to be nulliparous (P = 0.029 and P = 0.004, respectively). The most common reasons for refusal were fears of possible diagnosis of cervical cancer and compromise of future fertility. Most women who refused resorted to spiritual healing. Conclusion: The rate of refusal of colposcopy in southeast Nigeria was high, indicating an urgent need for appropriate remedial measures instituted through intensive education of women regarding cervical cancer and its prevention. Targeted counseling should be initiated early as part of prescreening counseling.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In this population, adherence to treatment and screening coverage may be reduced by fear of infertility.
“In this population, adherence to treatment and screening coverage may be reduced by fear of infertility [8, 9].”
From Fertility and Miscarriage Incidence After Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Treatment by Thermal Ablation: A Cohort Study (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wisniak, A., Yakam, V., Bolo, S. E., Moukam, A., Sormani, J., Vassilakos, P., Kenfack, B., & Petignat, P. (2025) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17954 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chigbu, C. O., & Aniebue, U. U.
- Affiliations
- University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (NG)
- Corresponding author
- Chigbu, Chibuike O.
- ORCID
- Chigbu, Chibuike O.
- Venue
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-02-23
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 100-102
- ISSN
- 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
- 0020-7292
- 1879-3479
- OpenAlex
- W2092293206
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Keywords
- cervical cancer screening, cervical cancer prevention, spiritual healing, nulliparity, resource-limited settings, South-East Nigeria
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Colposcopy, Fear, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Nigeria, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Databases, Factual, Treatment Refusal, Spiritual Therapies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review