Cited by 16Women's cancer prevention and managementCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchReproductive tract infections research

Non‐uptake of colposcopy in a resource‐poor setting

Chigbu, Chibuike O., Aniebue, Uzo U.·2011·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

Objective: To determine the rate of acceptance/refusal of colposcopy and the reasons for refusal by women referred for the procedure in southeast Nigeria. Methods: An audit was performed of the computerized database for all women referred for colposcopy at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, from August 1, 2009, to July 31, 2010. The characteristics of those who accepted colposcopy were compared with those who refused the procedure. An interviewer‐administered questionnaire was used to assess reasons for refusal and the subsequent treatment chosen. Results: During the study period, 154 women were referred for colposcopy: 103 (66.9%) accepted and 51 (33.1%) refused. Those who refused were younger and tended to be nulliparous (P = 0.029 and P = 0.004, respectively). The most common reasons for refusal were fears of possible diagnosis of cervical cancer and compromise of future fertility. Most women who refused resorted to spiritual healing. Conclusion: The rate of refusal of colposcopy in southeast Nigeria was high, indicating an urgent need for appropriate remedial measures instituted through intensive education of women regarding cervical cancer and its prevention. Targeted counseling should be initiated early as part of prescreening counseling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chigbu, C. O., & Aniebue, U. U.
Affiliations
University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (NG)
Corresponding author
Chigbu, Chibuike O.
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-23
Volume
113
Issue
2
Pages
100-102
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W2092293206
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, cervical cancer prevention, spiritual healing, nulliparity, resource-limited settings, South-East Nigeria
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Colposcopy, Fear, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Nigeria, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Databases, Factual, Treatment Refusal, Spiritual Therapies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review