Efficacy of the levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine system in uterine leiomyoma
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine system (LNG‐IUS) in reducing menstrual blood loss (MBL) in myoma‐related menorrhagia and to assess the effect of the LNG‐IUS on uterine and leiomyoma volume. Methods: A prospective comparative study investigated the effect of LNG‐IUS use in women with myoma‐related menorrhagia (n = 54) and women with idiopathic menorrhagia (n = 50). The outcome was assessed in terms of reductions in MBL and in myoma and uterine volume. Results: Within 1 month of LNG‐IUS insertion, the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart score in the myoma group fell by 86.8% (P < 0.0001). At 3, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, the MBL was reduced by 92.1%, 97.4%, 97.4%, 99.5%, and 99.5%, respectively, similar to the effect seen in the idiopathic menorrhagia group. The mean uterine volume was significantly reduced in both groups, but the reduction was greater in the group with leiomyomas (idiopathic menorrhagia, P = 0.038; myoma‐related menorrhagia, P = 0.012). There was no statistically significant reduction in the myoma volume (P = 0.409). Conclusion: Use of the LNG‐IUS appears to lead to a significant reduction in the uterine volume of women with menorrhagia, as well as reducing the MBL in women with uterine leiomyomas.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women treated with LNG-IUS are prone to develop functional ovarian cysts.
“Moreover, women treated with the device are prone to develop functional ovarian cysts [87] that could be misdiagnosed with ovarian endometriomas.”
From Oral and depot progestin therapy for endometriosis: towards a personalized medicine (2017) · cites this paper as [87]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 60
- Authors
- Kriplani, A., Awasthi, D., Kulshrestha, V., & Agarwal, N.
- Affiliations
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Agarwal, Nutan
- Venue
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-09-28
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-38
- ISSN
- 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
- 0020-7292
- 1879-3479
- OpenAlex
- W2039466335
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Keywords
- levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, uterine fibroids, menorrhagia, menstrual blood loss, uterine volume, Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart, hormonal contraception
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Intrauterine Devices, Medicated, Leiomyoma, Menorrhagia, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Uterine Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Levonorgestrel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review