Cited by 1Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsReproductive Health and Contraception

Trends and changes in home deliveries in Kassena–Nankana districts in northern Ghana: Results from repeated cross‐sectional surveys

Millogo, Tieba, Musenge, Eustasius, Azongo, Daniel K., Kouanda, Seni, Oduro, Abraham Rexford·2016·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

Objective: To investigate trends and changes in home deliveries in northern Ghana following the implementation of interventions targeting common barriers to utilization of health services. Methods: Data collected through repeated cross‐sectional surveys conducted in the Kassena–Nankana east and west districts from 2003–2009 were used in a secondary analysis. All childbirths that occurred in this period were included. Univariate time series were used to describe trends in home deliveries. Significant trends were investigated using the χ 2 test for trends, and changes in inequalities across subgroups were assessed by fitting simple linear regressions. Results: A total of 25 539 deliveries were recorded, of which 58.1% occurred at home. The incidence of home deliveries declined from 69.1% in 2003 to 36.5% in 2009 (P<0.001). This declining pattern was consistently observed within all subgroups defined by wealth index, and educational and residential status. Larger declines were observed in poor and rural residents compared with rich and urban residents (P<0.001). Conclusion: The incidence of home deliveries halved during the study period and there was a significant reduction in previous inequalities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.08.011

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Millogo, T., Musenge, E., Azongo, D. K., Kouanda, S., & Oduro, A. R.
Affiliations
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • Navrongo Health Research Centre (GH)
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11
Volume
135
Issue
S1
Pages
S33-S38
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W2553642246
Cited by
1
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
home delivery, childbirth location, health care utilization, barriers to care, socioeconomic disparities, urban-rural differences, wealth index, Kassena-Nankana District, Northern Ghana
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Ghana, Health Services Accessibility, Home Childbirth, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Health Services, Pregnancy, Health Behavior, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review