Socially augmented argumentation tools: Rationale, design and evaluation of a debate dashboard
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SNA was only used in five LA feedback studies.
“We found that SNA was only used in five LA feedback studies (Choi & Cho, 2020; Iandoli et al., 2014; Lim et al., 2020, 2021c; Misiejuk et al., 2021), though with various goals.”
From A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education (2022) · cites this paper as Iandoli et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 92 · Cited by 54
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Hall R., Miyake N., and Enyedy N. (Eds.), In CSCL'97 Proceedings of the 2nd International conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 10-20.
- Kirschner, P.A., Buckingham Shum, S., and Carr, C.S. (Eds.) Visualizing Argumentation - Software Tools for Collaboration and Educational Sense-making, Springer-Verlag, London, 75-96.
- Erickson, T., Kellogg, W.A. 2002. Knowledge Communities: Online Environments for Supporting Knowledge management and its Social Context, in Ackerman M.A., Pipek, V., and Wolf, W. (Eds.) Beyond knowledge management: Sharing expertise, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Hair, D.C. 1991. Legalese: A legal argumentation tool. SIGCHI Bulletin, 23(1), 71-74.
- McDonald, D.W., Beschastnikh, I., Kriplean, T., Borning, A., Zachry, M. 2009, System Design for Social Translucence in Socially Mediating Technologies. Socially Mediating Technologies Workshop at the ACM 2009 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09).
- Royal, M.A., Rossi, R.J. 1996. Individual-level correlates of sense of community: Findings from workplace and school. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 395-416.
- Toulmin, S. 1958. The use of Arguments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (MA).
- Authors
- Iandoli, L., Quinto, I., De Liddo, A., & Buckingham Shum, S.
- Affiliations
- Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Naples Federico II (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Iandoli, Luca
- Venue
- International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 298-319
- ISSN
- 1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974565354
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- oro.open.ac.uk
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Online (The Open University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (Parthenope University of Naples) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Keywords
- collective deliberation, argument visualization, online forums, collaborative knowledge building, participant interaction, usability, mutual understanding, decision accuracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
