The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of inclination angle on natural convection in enclosures filled with Cu–water nanofluid
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Effects of inclination angle on natural convection heat transfer and fluid flow in a two-dimensional enclosure filled with Cu-nanofluid has been analyzed numerically. The performance of nanofluids is tested inside an enclosure by taking into account the solid particle dispersion. The angle of inclination is used as a control parameter for flow and heat transfer. It was varied from = 0° to = 120°. The governing equations are solved with finite-volume technique for the range of Rayleigh numbers as 103 ⩽ Ra ⩽ 105. It is found that the effect of nanoparticles concentration on Nusselt number is more pronounced at low volume fraction than at high volume fraction. Inclination angle can be a control parameter for nanofluid filled enclosure. Percentage of heat transfer enhancement using nanoparticles decreases for higher Rayleigh numbers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haddad, Z., Abu-Nada, E., Oztop, H. F., & Mataoui, A. (2012) · International Journal of Thermal Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2012.01.016 · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Abu-Nada, E., & Oztop, H. F.
- Venue
- International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 669-678
- ISSN
- 0142-727X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134188039
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
