Cited by 31Icing and De-icing TechnologiesSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicitynanoparticles nucleation surface interactions

An experimental study of defrost on treated surfaces: Effect of frost slumping

Liu, Y., Kulacki, F.A.·2018·International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.12.018

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., & Kulacki, F. A.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Y.
Venue
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
119
Pages
880-890
ISSN
0017-9310 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2776128582
Cited by
31
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Minnesota Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Icing and De-icing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Keywords
superhydrophobic surfaces, superhydrophilic surfaces, meltwater drainage, force balance, frost melting, wettability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review