Cited by 158Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchWater Treatment and DisinfectionFluoride Effects and Removal

Occurrence of perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) in drinking water of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany and new approach to assess drinking water contamination by shorter-chained C4-C7 PFCs

Wilhelm, Michael, Bergmann, Sabine, Dieter, Hermann H.·2010·International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health

Abstract

After detection of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in drinking water at concentrations up to 0.64 microg/l in Arnsberg, Sauerland, Germany, the German Drinking Water Commission (TWK) assessed perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) in drinking water and set for the first time worldwide in June 2006 a health-based guide value for safe lifelong exposure at 0.3 microg/l (sum of PFOA and perfluorooctanesulfonate, PFOS). PFOA and PFOS can be effectively removed from drinking water by percolation over granular activated carbon. Additionally, recent EU-regulations require phasing out use of PFOS and ask to voluntarily reduce the one of PFOA. New and shorter-chained PFCs (C4-C7) and their mixtures are being introduced as replacements. We assume that some of these "new" compounds could be main contributors to total PFC levels in drinking water in future, especially since short-chained PFCs are difficult to remove from drinking water by common treatment techniques and also by filtration over activated carbon. The aims of the study were to summarize the data from the regularly measured PFC levels in drinking water and in the drinking water resources in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) for the sampling period 2008-2009, to give an overview on the general approach to assess PFC mixtures and to assess short-chained PFCs by using toxicokinetic instead of (sub)chronic data. No general increase of substitutes for PFOS and PFOA in wastewater and surface water was detected. Present findings of short-chained PFC…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.05.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 158

Authors
Wilhelm, M., Bergmann, S., & Dieter, H. H.
Affiliations
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Klima Nordrhein-Westfalen (DE)
  • German Environment Agency (DE)
Corresponding author
Dieter, Hermann H.
Venue
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
213
Issue
3
Pages
224-232
ISSN
1438-4639 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022809090
Cited by
158
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
FWCI
11.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, drinking water contamination, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, toxicokinetic modeling, half-life, lifetime exposure, drinking water treatment, groundwater contamination
MeSH terms
Caprylates, Environmental Exposure, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Reference Values, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Supply, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Water Purification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review