Cited by 851Culinary Culture and TourismDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchWine Industry and Tourism

Building a model of local food consumption on trips and holidays: A grounded theory approach

Kim, Yeong Gug, Eves, Anita, Scarles, Caroline·2009·International Journal of Hospitality Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.11.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 851

Authors
Kim, Y. G., Eves, A., & Scarles, C.
Affiliations
University of Surrey (GB)
Corresponding author
Kim, Yeong Gug
Venue
International Journal of Hospitality Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
423-431
ISSN
0278-4319 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165238512
Cited by
851
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 14
FWCI
21.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Hospitality Management (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Culinary Culture and Tourism
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Wine Industry and Tourism
Keywords
local food consumption, food tourism, tourist motivation, holidays, food neophilia, food neophobia, demographic factors, sensory appeal, authenticity, consumption models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review