CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is a shorter reaction time always better? Empirical investigation of the impact of response speed on ChatGPT recommendations

Kim, Jungkeun, Kim, Jeong Hyun, (Sam) Kim, Seongseop, Koo, Chulmo, Chung, Namho·2025·International Journal of Hospitality Management
DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2025.104239
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhm.2025.104239

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. Adaval, 1998, The role of narratives in consumer information processing, J. Consum. Psychol., 7, 207, 10.1207/s15327663jcp0703_01 · DOI
  2. Ali, 2023, Antecedents and consequences of travelers' trust towards personalized travel recommendations offered by ChatGPT, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 114, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103588 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Antonides, 2002, Consumer perception and evaluation of waiting time: a field experiment, J. Consum. Psychol., 12, 193, 10.1207/S15327663JCP1203_02 · DOI
  4. Baek, 2025, AI-generated recommendations: roles of language style, perceived AI human-likeness, and recommendation agent, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 126, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2025.104106 · DOI
  5. Borges, 2015, “It was not that long!”: the effects of the in-store TV screen content and consumers emotions on consumer waiting perception, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 22, 96, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.10.005 · DOI
  6. Chebat, 1993, The impact of waiting in line on consumers, Int. J. Bank Mark., 11, 35, 10.1108/02652329310025938 · DOI
  7. Chen, 2005, Cultural differences in consumer impatience, J. Mark. Res., 42, 291, 10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.3.291 · DOI
  8. Chen, 2023, ChatGPT: cross-cultural tourism research imperative, J. Econ. Manag., 45, 137
  9. Chen, 2021, Research on power-law distribution of long-tail data and its application to tourism recommendation, Ind. Manag. Data Syst., 121, 10.1108/IMDS-10-2019-0584 · DOI
  10. Chien, 2008, Effects of dynamic display, presentation method, speed, and task type on reading comprehension of wristwatch screens, Displays, 29, 471, 10.1016/j.displa.2008.03.005 · DOI
  11. Choi, 2024, ChatGPT or online review: which is a better determinant of customers’ trust in Airbnb listings and stay intention?, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 122, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103852 · DOI
  12. Cui, 2021, Impact of preciseness of price presentation on the magnitude of compromise and decoy effects, J. Bus. Res., 132, 641, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.017 · DOI
  13. Cutright, 2014, Doing it the hard way: how low control drives preferences for high-effort products and services, J. Consum. Res., 41, 730, 10.1086/677314 · DOI
  14. Dabholkar, 2008, Perceptions of download delays: relation to actual waits, web site abandoning, and stage of delay, Serv. Ind. J., 28, 1415, 10.1080/02642060802120166 · DOI
  15. Demir, 2023, Is ChatGPT the right technology for service individualization and value co-creation? evidence from the travel industry, J. Travel Tour. Mark., 40, 383, 10.1080/10548408.2023.2255884 · DOI
  16. Dogru, 2023, Generative artificial intelligence in the hospitality and tourism industry: developing a framework for future research, J. Hosp. Tour. Res.
  17. Dwivedi, 2023, Leveraging ChatGPT and other generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based applications in the hospitality and tourism industry: practices, challenges and research agenda, Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag.
  18. Dwivedi, 2024, Leveraging ChatGPT and other generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based applications in the hospitality and tourism industry: practices, challenges and research agenda, Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag., 36, 1, 10.1108/IJCHM-05-2023-0686 · DOI
  19. Fakfare, 2025, Customer word-of-mouth for generative AI: innovation and adoption in hospitality and tourism, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 126, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.104070 · DOI
  20. Fuchs, 2015, The handmade effect: what's love got to do with it?, J. Mark., 79, 98, 10.1509/jm.14.0018 · DOI
  21. Gong, 2022, Exploring the effects of official-structured managerial responses on hotel online popularity, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 106, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103293 · DOI
  22. Gopalakrishna, 1993, Influencing satisfaction for dental services, Mark. Health Serv., 13, 16
  23. Gursoy, 2023, ChatGPT and the hospitality and tourism industry: an overview of current trends and future research directions, J. Hosp. Mark. Manag., 32, 579
  24. Hagerty, 1984, A normative model of consumer information processing, Mark. Sci., 3, 227, 10.1287/mksc.3.3.227 · DOI
  25. He, 2019, Evolutionary food quality and location strategies for restaurants in competitive online-to-offline food ordering and delivery markets: an agent-based approach, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 215, 61, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.05.008 · DOI
  26. Herbst, 2012, On the dangers of pulling a fast one: advertisement disclaimer speed, brand trust, and purchase intention, J. Consum. Res., 38, 909, 10.1086/660854 · DOI
  27. Hong, 2013, When filling the wait makes it feel longer: a paradigm shift perspective for managing online delay, MIS Q., 37, 383, 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.04 · DOI
  28. Hsee, 2003, Lay rationalism and inconsistency between predicted experience and decision, J. Behav. Decis. Mak., 16, 257, 10.1002/bdm.445 · DOI
  29. Imelda, 2019, “WAZZ up doc?” Cost efficient, user friendly, patient trust level based on convenience and the use of hypnotherapy mobile apps method, Int. J. Bus. Stud., 3, 104, 10.32924/ijbs.v3i3.98 · DOI
  30. Jones, 1994, Improving service: managing response time in hospitality operations, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 14, 52, 10.1108/01443579410056795 · DOI
  31. Jung, 2023, When and how slow motion makes products more luxurious, J. Mark. Res., 60, 1177, 10.1177/00222437221146728 · DOI
  32. Kim, 2023, Why do experiments fail? Six practical suggestions for successful online experiments, J. Travel Res.
  33. Kim, 2023, Decisions with ChatGPT: reexamining choice overload in ChatGPT recommendations, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 75, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103494 · DOI
  34. Kim, 2024, Effects of AI ChatGPT on travelers’ travel decision-making, Tour. Rev., 10.1108/TR-07-2023-0489 · DOI
  35. Kim, 2023, Do you trust ChatGPTs? Effects of the ethical and quality issues of generative AI on travel decisions, J. Travel Tour. Mark., 40, 779, 10.1080/10548408.2023.2293006 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Kim, 2025, ChatGPT personalized and humorous recommendations, Ann. Tour. Res., 110, 10.1016/j.annals.2024.103857 · DOI
  37. Kim, 2001, Consumers' perceived importance of and satisfaction with internet shopping, Electron. Mark., 11, 148, 10.1080/101967801681007988 · DOI
  38. Koc, 2023, Houston, we have a problem!: the use of ChatGPT in responding to customer complaints, Technol. Soc., 74, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102333 · DOI
  39. Kurtaliqi, 2024, sing advanced mixed methods approaches: Combining PLS-SEM and qualitative studies, J. Bus. Res, 172, 114464, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114464 · DOI
  40. Lu, 2024, Investigating OTA employees’ double-edged perceptions of ChatGPT: the moderating role of organizational support, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 120, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103753 · DOI
  41. Mich, 2023, ChatGPT for e-Tourism: a technological perspective, Inf. Technol. Tour., 25, 1, 10.1007/s40558-023-00248-x · DOI
  42. Monsivais, 2014, Time spent on home food preparation and indicators of healthy eating, Am. J. Prev. Med., 47, 796, 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.033 · DOI
  43. Morales, 2005, Giving firms an “E” for effort: consumer responses to high-effort firms, J. Consum. Res., 31, 806, 10.1086/426615 · DOI
  44. Nagy, 2013, Improved speed on intelligent web sites, Recent Adv. Comput. Sci., 1, 215
  45. Nah, 2004, A study on tolerable waiting time: how long are web users willing to wait?, Behav. Inf., 23, 153, 10.1080/01449290410001669914 · DOI
  46. Nie, 2000, Waiting: integrating social and psychological perspectives in operations management, Omega, 28, 611, 10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00019-0 · DOI
  47. Oliver, 1980, A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions, J. Mark. Res., 17, 460, 10.1177/002224378001700405 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Otto, 2003, An experimental study of web switching behavior, Hum. Syst. Manag., 22, 87, 10.3233/HSM-2003-22204 · DOI
  49. Payne, 1997, Cue integration across study tasks and direct and indirect retrieval instructions: implications for the study of retrieval processes, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 23, 102
  50. Pham, 2024, What drives tourists’ continuance intention to use ChatGPT for travel services? A stimulus-organism-response perspective, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 78, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103758 · DOI
  51. Renko, 2014, Perceived usefulness of innovative technology in retailing: consumers׳ and retailers׳ point of view, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 21, 836, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.02.015 · DOI
  52. Rose, 2001, The effect of download time on consumer attitude toward the e-service retailer, e-Serv., 1, 55
  53. Schmidt, 2008, The characteristics of hotel websites and their implications for website effectiveness, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 27, 504, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.08.002 · DOI
  54. Schnitker, 2012, An examination of patience and well-being, J. Posit. Psychol., 7, 263, 10.1080/17439760.2012.697185 · DOI
  55. Shi, 2024, Finding the sweet spot: exploring the optimal communication delay for AI feedback tools, Inf. Process. Manag., 61, 10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103572 · DOI
  56. Shin, 2024, Exploring human-algorithm interaction online, Artif. misinformation, 10.1007/978-3-031-52569-8 · DOI
  57. Shin, 2023, Algorithmic nudge: an approach to designing human-centered generative artificial intelligence, Computer, 56, 95, 10.1109/MC.2023.3278156 · DOI
  58. Shuqair, 2024, When powerful artificial intelligence backfires, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 120, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103778 · DOI
  59. Solomovich, 2024, Exploring the influence of ChatGPT on tourism behavior using the technology acceptance model, Tour. Rev., 10.1108/TR-10-2023-0697 · DOI
  60. Sun, 2025, A methodological exploration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) for efficient qualitative analysis on hotel guests’ delightful experiences, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 124, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103974 · DOI
  61. Tashakkori, 2010, Putting the human back in ‘‘human research methodology’’: The researcher in mixed methods research, J. Mix. Methods Res., 4, 271, 10.1177/1558689810382532 · DOI
  62. Taylor, 1994, Waiting for service: the relationship between delays and evaluations of service, J. Mark., 58, 56, 10.1177/002224299405800205 · DOI
  63. Wong, 2023, Autonomous travel decision-making: an early glimpse into ChatGPT and generative AI, J. Hosp. Tour. Manag., 56, 253, 10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.06.022 · DOI
  64. Zakay, 1989, Subjective time and attentional resource allocation: an integrated model of time estimation, Adv. Psychol., 59, 365, 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61047-X · DOI
  65. Zhang, 2024, Co-creating with ChatGPT for tourism marketing materials, Ann. Tour. Res. Empir. Insights, 5
  66. Zhong, 2010, You are how you eat: fast food and impatience, Psychol. Sci., 21, 619, 10.1177/0956797610366090 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kim, J., Kim, J. H., (Sam) Kim, S., Koo, C., & Chung, N.
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Hospitality Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-09
Volume
130
Pages
104239
ISSN
0278-4319
DOI
10.1016/j.ijhm.2025.104239
Cited by
22
References
6
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Ministry of Education
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2023S1A5C2A03095253)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review