Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 966

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources

Acar, Canan, Dincer, Ibrahim·2014·International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.060
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.060

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Marcus, 2002, New designs for the nuclear renaissance, Phys Today, 55, 54, 10.1063/1.1480783 · DOI
  2. Naterer, 2011, Clean hydrogen production with the Cu–Cl cycle – progress of international consortium, I: experimental unit operations, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 36, 15472, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.08.012 · DOI
  3. Fujiwara, 2008, Hydrogen production by high temperature electrolysis with nuclear reactor, Prog Nucl Energy, 50, 422, 10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.11.025 · DOI
  4. Kone, 2010, Forecasting of CO2 emissions from fuel Combustion using trend analysis, Renew Sustainable Energy Rev, 14, 2906, 10.1016/j.rser.2010.06.006 · DOI
  5. Abánades, 2012, The challenge of hydrogen production for the transition to a CO2-free economy, Agron Res Biosystem Eng Spec, 1, 11
  6. Ozbilen, 2011, A comparative life cycle analysis of hydrogen production via thermochemical water splitting using a Cu–Cl cycle, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 36, 11321, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.035 · DOI
  7. Utgikar, 2006, Life cycle assessment of high temperature electrolysis for hydrogen production via nuclear energy, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 31, 939, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.07.001 · DOI
  8. Kopp, 2012, The U.S. Government's social cost of carbon estimates after their first two years: pathways for improvement, Economics, 6, 1, 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-15 · DOI
  9. Wang, 2010, Comparison of sulfur–iodine and copper–chlorine thermochemical hydrogen production cycles, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 35, 4820, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.09.006 · DOI
  10. Guerrero-Lemus, 2010, Updated hydrogen production cost and parities' for conventional and renewable technologies, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 35, 3929, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.034 · DOI
  11. Pregger, 2009, Prospects of solar thermal hydrogen production processes, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 4256, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.03.025 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Konda, 2011, Optimal transition towards a large-scale hydrogen infrastructure for the transport sector: the case for the Netherlands, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 36, 4619, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.01.104 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.01.104
  13. Dincer, 2012, Sustainable hydrogen production options and the role of IAHE, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 37, 16266, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.133 · DOI
  14. Büyükkara, 2012, The potential of the Netherlands and Turkey in the renewables arena, Afr J Bus Manage, 6, 3413

Cited by

See all 966

Metadata

Authors
Acar, C., & Dincer, I.
Venue
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.060
OpenAlex
W2058309654
Cited by
966
References
1
FWCI
26.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.060
The paper
Acar, C., & Dincer, I. (2014). Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.060

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.