Thermodynamic analysis of methanol steam reforming to produce hydrogen for HT-PEMFC: an optimization study
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Methanol steam reforming has a lower reforming temperature (473-573 K) than methane (1073-1273 K).
“Moreover, lower reforming temperature ð473 À573 KÞ than other carbon-based fuels such as methane ð1073 À1273 KÞ makes it suitable for stack integration with HT-PEM fuel cells and results in a lower CO production [1,5].”
From Comparison between 1D and 2D numerical models of a multi-tubular packed-bed reactor for methanol steam reforming (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
The lower reforming temperature of methanol steam reforming makes it suitable for stack integration with HT-PEM fuel cells and results in lower CO production.
“Moreover, lower reforming temperature ð473 À573 KÞ than other carbon-based fuels such as methane ð1073 À1273 KÞ makes it suitable for stack integration with HT-PEM fuel cells and results in a lower CO production [1,5].”
From Comparison between 1D and 2D numerical models of a multi-tubular packed-bed reactor for methanol steam reforming (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
The HT-PEM fuel cell is suitable to be integrated with an in-situ hydrogen production system without purification.
“By operating at a higher temperature, the HT-PEM fuel cell gets an improved tolerance towards carbon monoxide (CO) up to 3À 5% vol [1], making it suitable to be integrated with an in-situ hydrogen production system without purification.”
From Comparison between 1D and 2D numerical models of a multi-tubular packed-bed reactor for methanol steam reforming (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
The HT-PEM fuel cell has an improved tolerance towards carbon monoxide up to 3-5% vol.
“By operating at a higher temperature, the HT-PEM fuel cell gets an improved tolerance towards carbon monoxide (CO) up to 3À 5% vol [1], making it suitable to be integrated with an in-situ hydrogen production system without purification.”
From Comparison between 1D and 2D numerical models of a multi-tubular packed-bed reactor for methanol steam reforming (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large-vscale hydrogen production and storage technologies: Current status and future directions
Olabi, A. G., bahri, A. S., Abdelghafar, A. A., Baroutaji, A., Sayed, E. T., Alami, A. H., Rezk, H., & Abdelkareem, M. A. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.110 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Zhu, J., Cui, X., & Araya, S. S. (2022) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.109 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Özcan, O., & Akın, A. N.
- Affiliations
- Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Özcan, Orhan
- Venue
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 14117-14126
- ISSN
- 0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912267116
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (publishedVersion)
- Kocaeli Üniversitesi - AVESİS (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- methanol steam reforming, hydrogen production, high-temperature PEM fuel cells, thermodynamic equilibrium, process parameter optimization, response surface methodology, methanol conversion, carbon monoxide removal, product distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
