CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 146High-Velocity Impact and Material BehaviorMechanical Behavior of CompositesTransportation Safety and Impact Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

FE analysis of geometry effects of an artificial bird striking an aeroengine fan blade

Meguid, S.A., Mao, R.H., Ng, T.Y.·2008·International Journal of Impact Engineering
DOI 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.04.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.04.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Gao, 1990, Analytical and experimental investigation of bird impact on blades, J Aerospace Power, 5, 335
  2. Teichman, 1991, Analytical & experimental simulation of fan blade behavior & damage under bird impact, J Eng Gas Turb Power*****, 113, 582, 10.1115/1.2906281 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Wilbeck JS, Rand JL. The development of a substitute bird model. ASME Paper ASME 81-GT-23, Gas turbine conference and products show. Houston, TX, 1981.
  4. Chen, 2003, Numerical simulation of the transient response of blade due to bird impact, Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sinica, 24, 531
  5. Shimamura, 2004, Numerical simulation of bird strike damage on jet engine fan blade, ASME Press Vess Pip Div, 485, 161
  6. Frischbier J. Bird strike capability of a transonic fan blisk. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turboexpo 1997, Orlando, FL, 2–5 June 1997.
  7. Langrand, 2002, Assessment of multi-physics FE methods for bird strike modelling—application to a metallic riveted airframe, Int J Crashworth, 7, 415
  8. McCarthy, 2004, Modelling of bird strike on an aircraft wing leading edge made from fiber metal laminates—part 2: Modeling of impact with SPH bird model, Appl Compos Mater, 11, 317, 10.1023/B:ACMA.0000037134.93410.c0 · DOI
  9. Airoldi, 2006, Modelling of impact forces and pressures in Lagrangian bird strike analyses, Int J Impact Eng, 32, 1651, 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.011 · DOI
  10. Guan, 2004, Sliced model for bird impacting blades, J Nanjing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut, 36, 784
  11. Edge CH, Degrieck J. Derivation of a dummy bird for analysis and test of airframe structures. In: Proceedings of bird strike, 1999.
  12. Mao, 2006, Finite element modeling of a bird striking an engine fan blade, AIAA J of Aircraft
  13. Perzyna, 1966, vol. 9
  14. Stoll F, Brockman RA. Finite element simulation of high-speed soft-body impacts. In: Proceedings of the 1997 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structual dynamics and materials conference, Part 1, Kissimmee, FL, 1997. p. 334–44. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 146

Metadata

Authors
Meguid, S. A., Mao, R. H., & Ng, T. Y.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Meguid, S.A.
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Impact Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
487-498
ISSN
0734-743X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.04.008
OpenAlex
W2052471038
Cited by
146
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
International Journal of Impact Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical Behavior of Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis
Keywords
bird strikes, impact force, contact area, ellipsoids, impact impulse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review