The impact of trust and changes in trust: a national comparison of individual adoptions of information and communication technologies and related phenomenon
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Representatives of different countries vary in their disposition to trust.
“The range of studies advocates that representatives of different countries vary in their disposition to trust (Downes et al., 2002; Kirs and Bagchi, 2012).”
From How Culture and Trustworthiness Interact in Different E-Commerce Contexts: A Comparative Analysis of Consumers' Intention to Purchase on Platforms of Different Origins (2021) · cites this paper as Kirs and Bagchi, 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 89 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Kirs, P., & Bagchi, K.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kirs, Peeter
- Venue
- International Journal of Information Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 431-441
- ISSN
- 0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992774780
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › ICT Impact and Policies
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
- Keywords
- trust, generalized trust, ICT adoption, information and communication technologies, remote work, e-government readiness, national wealth, cross-national comparison, World Values Survey
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
