Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 61Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEducational Technology and AssessmentEdcuational Technology Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation module based on Bayesian networks to Intelligent Tutoring Systems

Ramírez-Noriega, Alan, Juárez-Ramírez, Reyes, Martínez-Ramírez, Yobani·2017·International Journal of Information Management

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.007

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cataldi, 2010, Modelado del Estudiante en Sistemas Tutores Inteligentes, Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologia en Educación y Educación enTecnología, 5, 29
  2. Millán, 2013, Using Bayesian networks to improve knowledge assessment, Computers & Education, 60, 436, 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.012 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ramírez-Noriega, A., Juárez-Ramírez, R., & Martínez-Ramírez, Y.
Venue
International Journal of Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
1488-1498
ISSN
0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2404383624
Cited by
61
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Edcuational Technology Systems
Keywords
intelligent tutoring systems, Bayesian networks, knowledge assessment, knowledge acquisition, adaptive testing, adaptive question selection, probabilistic inference, conceptual networks, knowledge diagnosis, personalized learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.