The DOI matches its Crossref record; 133 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social media trust: Fighting misinformation in the time of crisis
Open accessAbstract
During crises, the proliferation of misinformation, often termed "infodemics," can severely compromise Shared Situational Awareness (SSA) and impede effective response. With the advent of technology, social media platforms have become crucial tools for response agencies to counteract misinformation and promote SSA. Yet, the intricate dynamics between information dissemination, communication strategies, and trust, especially in the digital realm, remain underexplored. This research looks at the utilisation of technology, specifically social media platforms like Facebook, by response agencies to navigate the challenges of infodemics. Drawing from Seppänen et al. (2013) SSA model, we identified potential risks in digital crisis communication strategies that might undermine public trust and SSA. We used a netnographic analysis of the response agencies’ social media pages, supplemented by field interviews with agency representatives. Our findings contribute to the fields of Information Systems (IS) and communication by 1) highlighting the potential of technology, particularly social media, in crisis communication and misinformation mitigation, 2) identifying the risks and pitfalls of leveraging digital platforms during crises, and 3) underlying the consequences of diminishing public trust in official digital information channels, offering insights into mitigating misinformation and improving crisis response.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Fake accounts are used to influence civic belief, change the work atmosphere, and destroy confidence in social networks.”
From Instagram fake profile detection using an ensemble learning method (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Additionally, frequent exposure to emotionally manipulative content can increase emotions of mistrust and skeptics toward the social media as well as interpersonal connections.”
From The Psycho-Emotive Effects of AI-Generated Fake News on Social Media Users (2026) · cites this paper as Shahbazi & Bunker, 2024
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED: COVID-19 as an “Infodemic” in Public Health: Critical Role of the Social Media
Banerjee, D., & Meena, K. S. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.610623 · Cited by 160
RetractedUsing thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
Lewis, S. (2015) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839915580941 · Cited by 22,105
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
Djamba, Y. K., & Neuman, W. L. (2002) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/3211488 · Cited by 8,853
A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems1
Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249410 · Cited by 5,263
Siggelkow, N. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160882 · Cited by 3,472
Trust And Distrust: New Relationships and Realities
Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926620 · Cited by 3,091
Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.6.791 · Cited by 2,903
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Bertilsson, 2014, Critical netnography, Conducting Critical Research Online
- Coombs, 2018, Crisis Communication, Vol. 2
- Endsley, 1995, A taxonomy of situation awareness errors, Human factors in Aviation Operations, 3, 287
- Gkeredakis, 2021, Vol. 31
- Jiang, W., Gupta, A., Xiao, K., & Qin, X. (2021). What Facebook Messages Told Us About How We Handled Disaster Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic? Paper presented at the PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 PRE-ICIS SIGDSA SYMPOSIUM.
- Molter, 2020, Pandemics & propaganda: how Chinese state media creates and propagates CCP coronavirus narratives, Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1
- Shahbazi, M., Ehnis, C., Shahbazi, M., & Bunker, D. (2018). Tweeting from the Shadows: Social Media Convergence Behaviour During the 2017 Iran-Iraq Earthquake. Paper presented at the Proceedings of ISCRAM Asia Pacific.
- Terry, 2017, Vol. 2
- Thelwall, M., & Thelwall, S. (2020). Retweeting for COVID-19: Consensus building, information sharing, dissent, and lockdown life. arXiv.
- Walsham, 1993, Vol. 19
- Wiederhold, 2020, Vol. 23, 275
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–128 of 128
Fusing Headline and Content with Dual-BERT and Weighted Fusion for Fake News Detection
Nguyen, S. T., Huynh, T. T., & Le, T.-A. (2025) · International Conference on Cloud Computing and Internet of Things (CCIOT) · doi:10.1145/3785520.3785529
Pan, T., Guo, X., Sun, Y., & Yang, H. (2026) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-06-2025-0965
Human Society Empowerment Through Technology Expansion
Evangeline, S. I., & Huda, M. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0629-2.ch001
Akrawi, N., & Gintova, M. (2026) · Digital Government Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3807783
Al‐Rawi, A., Ackah, B., Fakida, A., & Lee, K. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/73275
Viral Uncertainty, How Rumours on Social Media Reshape Public Perceptions in Crises
Sorokhaibam, A., & Chanda, N. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6566-4.ch015
Rani, K. S., & Maheswari, K. S. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18346-0_18
MEDIA TRUST AND MISINFORMATION
Gore, R. P., & Shelke, R. (2026) · ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts · doi:10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i9s.2026.8038
Qu, C., Pang, Y., & Wu, Z. (2026) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2026.2672809
Weaponizing Lies on Social Media
Hossain, A., Simons, G., Khan, A. K., & Alam, S. (2026) · doi:10.1002/9781394375189.ch14
Nuhrintama, A. P., Abdullah, R. P. I., Alfian, H., Nuhrintama, A. F., & Mukhlisa, N. (2026) · Global Health Practice Journal · doi:10.65280/ghpj.v1i3.56
Emotion Impact and Contagion Mechanism of Misinformation: A Network‐Based Risk Analysis
Chen, Q. (2026) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.70265
Political Polarization on Social Media and Client Retention in Business-to-Business Firms
Bag, S., Routray, S., Rahman, M. S., Mishra, R., Singh, G., & Srivastava, S. K. (2026) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.411203
A quantum-like rumor propagation model captures bimodal spreading dynamics in social networks
Hou, H., Wang, Y., & Zhai, Q. (2026) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/5.0335015
Liu, J., Zuo, Y., Wang, C., & Zhang, T. (2026) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology · doi:10.1108/jhtt-05-2025-0447
Das, L., Kunja, S. R., & Yadav, M. (2026) · Asian Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s13520-026-00262-2
Çataldaş, İ. (2026) · İletişim ve Diplomasi · doi:10.54722/iletisimvediplomasi.1937523
Russia-Ukraine crisis communication strategies in Indonesia: A comparative analysis
Nova, F., Reztrianti, D., Handayani, E. N., Utomo, F. C., & Yusnita, U. (2026) · Multidisciplinary Science Journal · doi:10.31893/multiscience.2026770
Motloutsi, A. M. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-2885-8.ch009
Enhancing sentiment analysis through hybrid methods in agricultural digitalization
Mufida, E. N. S., & Utamima, A. (2026) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2026.07.062
1941954.1 Introduction: Governments and Online Political Communication
McDowell, S. D. (2026) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783111386034-017
Chatterjee, R. S., Hameed, I., Waris, I., Hosen, M., & Rehman, H. M. (2026) · International Journal of Innovation Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijis.2026.100224
Stewart, M. C. H., Arnold, C. L., Richard, F. D., & Beasley, B. A. (2026) · Atlantic Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/15456870.2026.2727611
Oman’s strategic utilization of soft power in crisis management (Muscat terrorist attack)
Almujaini, A., Hijji, K. Z. A., & Shahatah, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2026.1788015
Ji, Q., Tang, J., Ye, L., & Wang, H. (2026) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2026.134338
Lazaridou, Z., & Spais, G. S. (2026) · Journal of Promotion Management · doi:10.1080/10496491.2026.2726908
Wu, Y., Liu, Y., & Lv, C. (2026) · Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management · doi:10.1111/1468-5973.70239
Anom, E., Ibrahim, F., Humaizi, H., & Asmedi, S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11290007/v1
Metadata
- Authors
- Shahbazi, M., & Bunker, D.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Shahbazi, Maryam
- Venue
- International Journal of Information Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-08
- Volume
- 77
- Pages
- 102780
- ISSN
- 0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392978142
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 140
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 18
- FWCI
- 105.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Keywords
- trust in social media, misinformation, infodemic, crisis communication, shared situational awareness, Facebook, public trust, netnography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review