Building trust among enemies: the central challenge for international conflict resolution
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This orientation aligns with contemporary conflict-resolution practices that emphasize empathy, narrative exchange, and trust-building.
“This orientation aligns with contemporary conflict-resolution practices that emphasize empathy, narrative exchange, and trust-building (Kelman, 2005).”
From Toward a humanized technology: a reinterpretation of Erich Fromm’ s humanistic peace psychology (2026) · cites this paper as Kelman, 2005
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a humanized technology: a reinterpretation of Erich Fromm’ s humanistic peace psychology
Wang, Y., Li, P., & Liu, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1646601 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kelman, H. C.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kelman, Herbert C.
- ORCID
- Kelman, Herbert C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Intercultural Relations
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 639-650
- ISSN
- 0147-1767 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047196113
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 15.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Intercultural Relations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education for Peace and Conflict Resolution
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
- Keywords
- trust building, international conflict resolution, peace process, interactive problem solving, unofficial diplomacy, Israeli-Palestinian conflict, successive approximations, third-party mediation, coalition building, reciprocity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
