Cited by 8Palliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Euthanasia requests in a Canadian psychiatric outpatient clinic: A case series part 2 of the McGill University euthanasia in psychiatry case series

Perreault, Antoine, Benrimoh, David, Fielding, Allan·2019·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Abstract

The Canadian province of Quebec enacted in 2014 a legislation that permitted medical assistance in dying (MAID) under specific conditions and the rest of Canada followed suit in June 2016. In this article, which is the second in a set of case series of requests for MAID in Canadian psychiatry, we present the cases of two patients who made a request for MAID to their treating psychiatrist in an outpatient clinic. While one is advanced in age and suffering from intense physical and psychic pain with little if any psychiatric comorbidity, the other is a young and medically healthy woman who nonetheless suffers from extensive psychiatric comorbidity. This article discusses both cases in light of recent scientific literature and case law that is slowly emerging in Canada, focusing on the concepts of the end of life and its legal definition as well as psychic suffering and its management in those wishing to receive physician-assisted dying. In our conclusion, we stress the need to clarify the definition of treatment resistance, the necessity to determine each physician's role when many are involved, as well as the importance of treating psychic pain holistically, which can sometimes require going beyond standard psychiatric care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101464

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Canada, a series of psychiatric patients who applied for MAiD-NT were denied it although, based on their characteristics, they would have been eligible for MAiD-NT in other countries such as Belgium or the Netherlands.

    “A series of cases of patients with psychiatric disorders who applied for MAiD-NT were denied it, although, based on their characteristics, would have been eligible for MAiD-NT in other countries (e.g. Belgium, Netherlands) [67, 68].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 8

Authors
Perreault, A., Benrimoh, D., & Fielding, A.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Perreault, Antoine
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
66
Pages
101464
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2959250560
Cited by
8
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
McGill University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
medical assistance in dying, physician-assisted death, euthanasia requests, psychiatric comorbidity, psychological suffering, end of life, treatment resistance, outpatient psychiatric care, physician role, holistic pain management
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Mental Disorders, Canada, Euthanasia, Female, Humans, Psychiatry, Quebec, Universities, Comorbidity, Suicide, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review