Euthanasia requests in a Canadian psychiatric outpatient clinic: A case series part 2 of the McGill University euthanasia in psychiatry case series
Abstract
The Canadian province of Quebec enacted in 2014 a legislation that permitted medical assistance in dying (MAID) under specific conditions and the rest of Canada followed suit in June 2016. In this article, which is the second in a set of case series of requests for MAID in Canadian psychiatry, we present the cases of two patients who made a request for MAID to their treating psychiatrist in an outpatient clinic. While one is advanced in age and suffering from intense physical and psychic pain with little if any psychiatric comorbidity, the other is a young and medically healthy woman who nonetheless suffers from extensive psychiatric comorbidity. This article discusses both cases in light of recent scientific literature and case law that is slowly emerging in Canada, focusing on the concepts of the end of life and its legal definition as well as psychic suffering and its management in those wishing to receive physician-assisted dying. In our conclusion, we stress the need to clarify the definition of treatment resistance, the necessity to determine each physician's role when many are involved, as well as the importance of treating psychic pain holistically, which can sometimes require going beyond standard psychiatric care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Canada, a series of psychiatric patients who applied for MAiD-NT were denied it although, based on their characteristics, they would have been eligible for MAiD-NT in other countries such as Belgium or the Netherlands.
“A series of cases of patients with psychiatric disorders who applied for MAiD-NT were denied it, although, based on their characteristics, would have been eligible for MAiD-NT in other countries (e.g. Belgium, Netherlands) [67, 68].”
From Debating Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Death in People with Psychiatric Disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [67]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Perreault, A., Benrimoh, D., & Fielding, A.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Perreault, Antoine
- ORCID
- Benrimoh, David
- Venue
- International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 66
- Pages
- 101464
- ISSN
- 0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2959250560
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- McGill University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- medical assistance in dying, physician-assisted death, euthanasia requests, psychiatric comorbidity, psychological suffering, end of life, treatment resistance, outpatient psychiatric care, physician role, holistic pain management
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Mental Disorders, Canada, Euthanasia, Female, Humans, Psychiatry, Quebec, Universities, Comorbidity, Suicide, Assisted
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review