Cited by 7Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsEthics and bioethics in healthcareHealth, Medicine and Society

Age, psychiatry admission status and linear mental capacity for treatment decisions

Curley, Aoife, Murphy, Ruth, Fleming, Sean, Kelly, Brendan D.·2019·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Abstract

The relationship between age and mental capacity among psychiatry inpatients is not fully understood. We aimed to assess mental capacity for treatment decisions in voluntary and involuntary psychiatry inpatients in Ireland and, in this analysis of our data-set, to elucidate the linear relationship, if any, between linear (as opposed to categorical) mental capacity and age. We used the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) to assess mental capacity for treatment decisions in 215 psychiatry inpatients (176 voluntary and 39 involuntary) in four psychiatry admission units in Ireland. Mean age was 46.2 years and majorities were male (58.1%), never married (74.0%), unemployed (64.2%) and of Irish ethnicity (87.0%). The most common primary diagnoses were schizophrenia and related disorders (42.8%) followed by affective disorders (36.7%). On multi-variable linear regression analysis, linear mental capacity was significantly associated with voluntary admission status, being employed, having a primary diagnosis other than schizophrenia or a related disorder, and younger age. Together, these factors accounted for 44.4% of the variance in mental capacity between participants. Overall, while increased age is associated with diminished mental capacity, other factors appear more significant, including involuntary admission status which is likely an indicator of symptom severity. There is a need for further research to (a) elucidate the relationships between the significant factors identified in this study and the cognitive status of patients (which impacts on assessments of mental capacity); (b) identify and elucidate other factors of likely relevance to mental capacity (e.g. medical illness, medication use); and (c) translate these findings into targeted interventions to support decision-making in clinical practice among psychiatry inpatients, especially those with involuntary status.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101469

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 7

Authors
Curley, A., Murphy, R., Fleming, S., & Kelly, B. D.
Affiliations
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • Midland Regional Hospital Portlaoise (IE)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Brendan D.
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
66
Pages
101469
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2962255248
Cited by
7
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
decision-making capacity, treatment decision-making, involuntary admission, voluntary admission, age, schizophrenia, mood disorders, symptom severity, decision support
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Decision Making, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Ireland, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Linear Models, Mental Competency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review