Age, psychiatry admission status and linear mental capacity for treatment decisions
Abstract
The relationship between age and mental capacity among psychiatry inpatients is not fully understood. We aimed to assess mental capacity for treatment decisions in voluntary and involuntary psychiatry inpatients in Ireland and, in this analysis of our data-set, to elucidate the linear relationship, if any, between linear (as opposed to categorical) mental capacity and age. We used the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) to assess mental capacity for treatment decisions in 215 psychiatry inpatients (176 voluntary and 39 involuntary) in four psychiatry admission units in Ireland. Mean age was 46.2 years and majorities were male (58.1%), never married (74.0%), unemployed (64.2%) and of Irish ethnicity (87.0%). The most common primary diagnoses were schizophrenia and related disorders (42.8%) followed by affective disorders (36.7%). On multi-variable linear regression analysis, linear mental capacity was significantly associated with voluntary admission status, being employed, having a primary diagnosis other than schizophrenia or a related disorder, and younger age. Together, these factors accounted for 44.4% of the variance in mental capacity between participants. Overall, while increased age is associated with diminished mental capacity, other factors appear more significant, including involuntary admission status which is likely an indicator of symptom severity. There is a need for further research to (a) elucidate the relationships between the significant factors identified in this study and the cognitive status of patients (which impacts on assessments of mental capacity); (b) identify and elucidate other factors of likely relevance to mental capacity (e.g. medical illness, medication use); and (c) translate these findings into targeted interventions to support decision-making in clinical practice among psychiatry inpatients, especially those with involuntary status.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only one study found a significant association with older age.
“Only one study found a significant association with older age (Curley, Murphy, Fleming, et al., 2019).”
From Decision making capacity for treatment in psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Curley, Murphy, Fleming, et al., 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Curley, A., Murphy, R., Fleming, S., & Kelly, B. D.
- Affiliations
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- Midland Regional Hospital Portlaoise (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Kelly, Brendan D.
- ORCID
- Kelly, Brendan D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 66
- Pages
- 101469
- ISSN
- 0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2962255248
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Keywords
- decision-making capacity, treatment decision-making, involuntary admission, voluntary admission, age, schizophrenia, mood disorders, symptom severity, decision support
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Mental Disorders, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Decision Making, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Ireland, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Linear Models, Mental Competency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review