An investigation into low mail survey response rates of information technology users in health care organizations
Open accessAbstract
Surveys conducted by mail can result in a very low response rate raising the possibility of non-response bias that would question the validity of the findings. In this study, we compare the demographic profiles between the respondents and non-respondents, and conduct wave analysis as an alternative way to estimate the non-response bias among the information technology (IT) users in the health care industry. Our findings indicate that there is no significant difference among the respondents when considering the duration (early versus late) of response rate. Likewise, there was no significant difference when the available demographic characteristics (facility type and user's position) of those who responded were compared to the same characteristics of the sample. We were able to reach similar conclusion by using either of the proposed methods; analysis of demographic profiles of respondents versus non-respondents, and wave analysis. Thus our findings support the validity of the results from low response mail survey studies for IT users.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A low response rate does not necessarily mean a threat to research validity, especially when representative participants are involved.
“A low response rate does not necessary mean a threat to research validity, especially when representative participants are involved (Dillman, 1991;Hikmet & Chen, 2003).”
From Teachers’ perceptions of declining participation in school music (2011) · cites this paper as Hikmet & Chen, 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: a structural equation model
Wu, J.-H., Wang, S.-C., & Lin, L.-M. (2007) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.006 · Cited by 603 · see citing works
Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals
AGGELIDIS, V, & CHATZOGLOU, P. (2009) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.006 · Cited by 553 · see citing works
Menachemi, N., Prickett, C. T., & Brooks, R. G. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1578 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Teachers’ perceptions of declining participation in school music
Ng, C.-H. C., & Hartwig, K. (2011) · Research Studies in Music Education · doi:10.1177/1321103x11423598 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hikmet, N., & Chen, S. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Rhode Island (US)
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 29-34
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033759514
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 24.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Journal of Media Literacy Education (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Keywords
- mail survey response rates, nonresponse bias, wave analysis, survey validity, health care organization
- MeSH terms
- Community Participation, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Postal Service, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Information Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review