Who is in charge of patient safety? Work practice, work processes and utopian views of automatic drug dispensing systems
Abstract
In June 2003, a large, Canadian tertiary care facility introduced automatic drug dispensing machines on all units when it opened up a new building. In this paper, we provide an overview of the automatic drug dispensing system (ADS) implementation at the hospital. Our findings, based on daily field observations and interviews during and after implementation, with regular follow-up visits to the field site illustrate how the introduction of the ADS brought to light work practices that sometimes compromised patient safety. We suggest that utopian views of automatic drug dispensing machines obfuscate the challenges inherent to implementing such systems, and deter stakeholders from performing rigorous evaluation of the costs (both social and economic) and benefits of investing in such systems. Our work contributes to debates about the socio-technical efficacy of automating medication dispensing and delivery, and suggests that the balance of power in the patient safety equation lies in the work context and implementation issues, and not just the technology. For technology implementations to be successful considering that technologies frequently cross over jurisdictional boundaries, planning and implementation have to be conducted at a system wide level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A prevalent method of addressing user challenges was robust staff training.
“A prevalent method of addressing such user challenges was robust staff training.14,22,33”
From Benefits and challenges associated with implementation and ongoing use of automated dispensing cabinet for medicines: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
Challenges associated with inventory management of medicines requiring special storage requirements have been described in published literature.
“Challenges associated with inventory management of medicines which require special storage requirements have been described in published literature.”
From Benefits and challenges associated with implementation and ongoing use of automated dispensing cabinet for medicines: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Automated dose dispensing service for primary healthcare patients: a systematic review
Sinnemäki, J., Sihvo, S., Isojärvi, J., Blom, M., Airaksinen, M., & Mäntylä, A. (2013) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-2-1 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Jennings, B. M., Sandelowski, M., & Mark, B. (2011) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732311411927 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Jung, Y. Y., Walsh, Á., Patel, J., & Lai, K. (2025) · Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100599 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“14,22,33 While re-education was emphasised in studies, Lichtner et al. stressed that nurses ’ information needs, patients ’ clinical needs, context-specific medication work processes, and common work practices largely contribute to ADC challenges, hence needs to be considered.”
- Authors
- Balka, E., Kahnamoui, N., & Nutland, K.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Balka, Ellen
- ORCID
- Balka, Ellen
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 76
- Pages
- S48-S57
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069719657
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- patient safety, hospital implementation, work practices, work processes, socio-technical systems, technology implementation, balance of power
- MeSH terms
- Canada, Interviews as Topic, Medication Errors, Medication Systems, Hospital, Efficiency, Organizational, Safety Management, Observation, Organizational Case Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review