A methodology for shifting the focus of e-health support design onto user needs
Abstract
Background Epidemiological shifts, financial pressures and changing policy priorities in healthcare initiate reflections on innovative ways to deliver care. Technologies offer opportunities to change health services delivery. One of the emerging fields is telehomecare-applications. Yet, these applications are not always adapted to the user needs and characteristics of the homecare setting, resulting in "system failure".Objectives We describe a generic methodological model to incorporate user perspectives in the design and development process of e-health systems. The model aims at grounding the choice of the technology in a clear understanding of the homecare field, and on interactive reflections with the technology developers.Methods and results The methodological model develops over three phases. A first phase aims to identify and to select potential patient groups for which the technology will be developed: It holds (a) gathering of epidemiological data; (b) identifying relevant inclusion criteria to select patient groups; (c) qualitative weighting based on the inclusion criteria to include potential patient groups and (d) plenary discussion with the technology developers. In a second phase, the particular needs of the selected patient groups are assessed through literature review, document analysis and explorative interviews with key informants. In the third phase, "social" use cases are developed in which the use of potential technologies is written as virtual storylines. The writing of the use cases is prepared through a semi-structured questionnaire for all partners listing the "visions and expectations on the technology and user context". The use cases are the source documents for a plenary discussion with the technology developers in which priorities are set for functionalities of the e-homecare platform. The methodological approach is illustrated within the Coplintho-project. It is a Flemish initiative developing an e-homecare platform offering a package of services on a dedicated device to support the social integration and 'independent living' of people in their home environment.Discussion Our methodological approach provides a practical framework for understanding and considering user perspectives. The application of the method within the development of the Coplintho-e-homecare platform demonstrated its usefulness. The experience within the Coplintho-pilot project learned important lessons about the operational use of the method. The methodology is time-consuming and requires scientific input to assess and to document potential user needs, requiring specific means and human resources. The method also requires a very explicit project management of the preparatory phase.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Theoretical frameworks regarding user-centered design have been used as guidelines during development processes of telecare products and services.
“Theoretical frameworks regarding user-centered design (UCD) have been used as guidelines during the development processes of telecare products and services [16-22].”
From Experiences of Multidisciplinary Development Team Members During User-Centered Design of Telecare Products and Services: A Qualitative Study (2014) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 117 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- De Rouck, S., Jacobs, A., & Leys, M.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 589-601
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1560635067
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- e-health, home care, telehomecare, user needs, user-centered design, use case development, social integration, independent living, health technology development
- MeSH terms
- Health Services Needs and Demand, Home Care Services, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Telemedicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review