The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Framing the evidence for health smart homes and home-based consumer health technologies as a public health intervention for independent aging: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Introduction There is a critical need for public health interventions to support the independence of older adults as the world’s population ages. Health smart homes (HSH) and home-based consumer health (HCH) technologies may play a role in these interventions. Methods We conducted a systematic review of HSH and HCH literature from indexed repositories for health care and technology disciplines (e.g., MEDLINE, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore) and classified included studies according to an evidence-based public health (EBPH) typology. Results One thousand, six hundred and thirty nine candidate articles were identified. Thirty-one studies from the years 1998–2011 were included. Twenty-one included studies were classified as emerging, 10 as promising and 3 as effective (first tier). Conclusion The majority of included studies were published in the period beginning in the year 2005. All 3 effective (first tier) studies and 9 of 10 of promising studies were published during this period. Almost all studies included an activity sensing component and most of these used passive infrared motion sensors. The three effective (first tier) studies all used a multicomponent technology approach that included activity sensing, reminders and other technologies tailored to individual preferences. Future research should explore the use of technology for self-management of health by older adults, social support and self-reported health measures incorporated into personal health records, electronic medical records, and community health registries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Health informatics and the delivery of care to older people
Koch, S., & Hägglund, M. (2009) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.03.023 · Cited by 94
Cited by
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., van der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J. M., & Wouters, E. J. M. (2016) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000430949 · Cited by 19,690
Participatory Design in Gerontechnology: A Systematic Literature Review
Merkel, S., & Kucharski, A. (2019) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gny034 · Cited by 209
Technology and caregiving: emerging interventions and directions for research
Lindeman, D. A., Kim, K. K., Gladstone, C., & Apesoa-Varano, E. C. (2020) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnz178 · Cited by 182
Using artificial intelligence for systematic review: the example of elicit
Bernard, N., Sagawa Jr, Y., Bier, N., Lihoreau, T., Pazart, L., & Tannou, T. (2025) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-025-02528-y · Cited by 93
Karlsen, C., Ludvigsen, M. S., Moe, C. E., Haraldstad, K., & Thygesen, E. (2017) · JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2017-003345 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Reeder, B., Meyer, E., Lazar, A., Chaudhuri, S., Thompson, H. J., & Demiris, G.
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 565-579
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059178055
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Framing the evidence for health smart homes and home-based consumer health technologies as a public health intervention for independent aging: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.03.007
- The paper
- Reeder, B., Meyer, E., Lazar, A., Chaudhuri, S., Thompson, H. J., & Demiris, G. (2013). Framing the evidence for health smart homes and home-based consumer health technologies as a public health intervention for independent aging: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.03.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.