Scale-up of networked HIV treatment in Nigeria: Creation of an integrated electronic medical records system
Abstract
Objectives The implementation of PEPFAR programs in resource-limited settings was accompanied by the need to document patient care on a scale unprecedented in environments where paper-based records were the norm. We describe the development of an electronic medical records system (EMRS) put in place at the beginning of a large HIV/AIDS care and treatment program in Nigeria. Methods Databases were created to record laboratory results, medications prescribed and dispensed, and clinical assessments, using a relational database program. A collection of stand-alone files recorded different elements of patient care, linked together by utilities that aggregated data on national standard indicators and assessed patient care for quality improvement, tracked patients requiring follow-up, generated counts of ART regimens dispensed, and provided 'snapshots' of a patient's response to treatment. A secure server was used to store patient files for backup and transfer. Results By February 2012, when the program transitioned to local in-country management by APIN, the EMRS was used in 33 hospitals across the country, with 4,947,433 adult, pediatric and PMTCT records that had been created and continued to be available for use in patient care. Ongoing trainings for data managers, along with an iterative process of implementing changes to the databases and forms based on user feedback, were needed. As the program scaled up and the volume of laboratory tests increased, results were produced in a digital format, wherever possible, that could be automatically transferred to the EMRS. Many larger clinics began to link some or all of the databases to local area networks, making them available to a larger group of staff members, or providing the ability to enter information simultaneously where needed. Conclusions The EMRS improved patient care, enabled efficient reporting to the Government of Nigeria and to U.S. funding agencies, and allowed program managers and staff to conduct quality control audits.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several LMICs have gone beyond initial pilot EHR system implementations to large-scale rollout of these systems in government-run public facilities.
“Several LMICs have gone beyond initial pilot EHR system implementations to large-scale rollout of these systems in government-run public facilities.”
From mUzima Mobile Electronic Health Record (EHR) System: Development and Implementation at Scale (2021) · cites this paper as [6]
Countries like Kenya, Uganda, Nigeria, and Mozambique now run nationally endorsed EHR systems that are deployed in hundreds to thousands of public health facilities across each country.
“Countries like Kenya, Uganda, Nigeria, and Mozambique now run nationally endorsed EHR systems that are deployed in hundreds to thousands of public health facilities across each country [4-7].”
From mUzima Mobile Electronic Health Record (EHR) System: Development and Implementation at Scale (2021) · cites this paper as [6]
Cites
Douglas, G. P., Gadabu, O. J., Joukes, S., Mumba, S., McKay, M. V., Ben-Smith, A., Jahn, A., Schouten, E. J., Landis Lewis, Z., van Oosterhout, J. J., et al. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000319 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Nucita, A., Bernava, G. M., Bartolo, M., Masi, F. D. P., Giglio, P., Peroni, M., Pizzimenti, G., & Palombi, L. (2009) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-9-42 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
mUzima Mobile Electronic Health Record (EHR) System: Development and Implementation at Scale
Were, M. C., Savai, S., Mokaya, B., Mbugua, S., Ribeka, N., Cholli, P., & Yeung, A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26381 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Countries like Kenya, Uganda, Nigeria, and Mozambique now run nationally endorsed EHR systems that are deployed in hundreds to thousands of public health facilities across each country [4-7].”
Background
- Authors
- Chaplin, B., Meloni, S., Eisen, G., Jolayemi, T., Banigbe, B., Adeola, J., Wen, C., Reyes Nieva, H., Chang, C., Okonkwo, P., & Kanki, P.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- AIDS Prevention Initiative in Nigeria (NG)
- Corresponding author
- Kanki, Phyllis
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-68
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005125238
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 13.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (U51HA02522)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Keywords
- electronic health records, HIV care, antiretroviral therapy, PEPFAR, program scale-up, integrated health information systems, relational databases, laboratory data integration, quality improvement, prevention of mother-to-child transmission, Nigeria, health data management
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Child, Data Collection, Health Plan Implementation, Health Resources, HIV, Hospital Information Systems, Humans, Nigeria, Quality of Health Care, HIV Infections, Medical Records Systems, Computerized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review