Cited by 100Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsElectronic Health Records SystemsHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring

Clinical safety of England's national programme for IT: A retrospective analysis of all reported safety events 2005 to 2011

Magrabi, Farah, Baker, Maureen, Sinha, Ipsita, Ong, Mei-Sing, Harrison, Stuart, Kidd, Michael R., Runciman, William B., Coiera, Enrico·2015·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Objective To analyse patient safety events associated with England's national programme for IT (NPfIT).Methods Retrospective analysis of all safety events managed by a dedicated IT safety team between September 2005 and November 2011 was undertaken. Events were reviewed against an existing classification for problems associated with IT. The proportion of reported events per problem type, consequences, source of report, resolution within 24h, time of day and day of week were examined. Sub-group analyses were undertaken for events involving patient harm and those that occurred on a large scale.Results Of the 850 events analysed, 68% (n=574) described potentially hazardous circumstances, 24% (n=205) had an observable impact on care delivery, 4% (n=36) were a near miss, and 3% (n=22) were associated with patient harm, including three deaths (0·35%). Eleven events did not have a noticeable consequence (1%) and two were complaints (<1%). Amongst the events 1606 separate contributing problems were identified. Of these 92% were predominately associated with technical rather than human factors. Problems involving human factors were four times as likely to result in patient harm than technical problems (25% versus 8%; OR 3·98, 95%CI 1·90-8.34). Large-scale events affecting 10 or more individuals or multiple IT systems accounted for 23% (n=191) of the sample and were significantly more likely to result in a near miss (6% versus 4%) or impact the delivery of care (39% versus 20%; p<0·001).Conclusion Events associated with NPfIT reinforce that the use of IT does create hazardous circumstances and can lead to patient harm or death. Large-scale patient safety events have the potential to affect many patients and clinicians, and this suggests that addressing them should be a priority for all major IT implementations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.12.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 100

Authors
Magrabi, F., Baker, M., Sinha, I., Ong, M.-S., Harrison, S., Kidd, M. R., Runciman, W. B., & Coiera, E.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • NHS Digital (GB)
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Magrabi, Farah
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
84
Issue
3
Pages
198-206
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006934779
Cited by
100
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12
FWCI
25.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Keywords
National Programme for IT, patient safety, health information technology, patient harm, human factors, technical challenges, near misses, IT implementation, England
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, England, Humans, Medical Informatics, Retrospective Studies, Risk Management, State Medicine, User-Computer Interface, Safety Management, Medical Errors, Equipment Failure Analysis, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review