Cited by 54Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Errors and Causes of Communication Failures from Hospital Information Systems to Electronic Health Record: A Record-Review Study

Khajouei, Reza, Abbasi, Reza, Mirzaee, Moghaddameh·2018·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Introduction Failure in the communication of information and partial communication of information between hospital information systems (HIS) and the Iranian electronic health record (SEPAS) reduces the quality of information. The objective of this study was to identify the errors and causes of failure in the communication of patients' information from HISs to SEPAS. Methodology This record-review study was conducted in the first quarter of 2016. In this study, 882 records which had failed to be sent from three hospital information systems to SEPAS were reviewed and data were collected using a data collection form. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics with SPSS.18. Results The review of 882 hospital records resulted in the identification of 1256 errors of 41 different types. These errors were classified into 4 categories: administrative-financial errors (61%), errors related to national codes (23%), clinical errors (9%), and other errors (7%). In total, errors were categorized into two generic types: "system level errors (65%) and operator-dependent errors (35%)". The number of errors was a significant difference in the studied hospitals (p Conclusions This study identified a large number of system and operator-dependent errors hampering communication of information from HIS to SEPAS. Results revealed that the same hospital information systems used in different hospitals could face dissimilar types and levels of errors when communicating with other i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interoperability problems when transferring data between two different medical record systems can result in absent final diagnoses or national diagnostic codes, compromising the quality of the information and leading to diagnostic errors.

    “Additionally, interoperability problems when transferring data between two different medical record systems can result in absent final diagnoses or national diagnostic codes, compromising the quality of the information and leading to diagnostic errors [179].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 26 · Cited by 54

Authors
Khajouei, R., Abbasi, R., & Mirzaee, M.
Affiliations
  • Kerman University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Kashan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Abbasi, Reza
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
119
Pages
47-53
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891098420
Cited by
54
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Information System of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences (Ardabil University of Medical Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Informatics Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences (IR.KMU.REC.1394.222)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
hospital information systems, electronic health records, health information exchange, communication breakdown, data errors, medical errors, operator error, system errors, interoperability, Iran
MeSH terms
Communication Barriers, Hospital Information Systems, Hospitals, Humans, Medical Records, Medical Errors, Information Dissemination, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review