Errors and Causes of Communication Failures from Hospital Information Systems to Electronic Health Record: A Record-Review Study
Abstract
Introduction Failure in the communication of information and partial communication of information between hospital information systems (HIS) and the Iranian electronic health record (SEPAS) reduces the quality of information. The objective of this study was to identify the errors and causes of failure in the communication of patients' information from HISs to SEPAS. Methodology This record-review study was conducted in the first quarter of 2016. In this study, 882 records which had failed to be sent from three hospital information systems to SEPAS were reviewed and data were collected using a data collection form. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics with SPSS.18. Results The review of 882 hospital records resulted in the identification of 1256 errors of 41 different types. These errors were classified into 4 categories: administrative-financial errors (61%), errors related to national codes (23%), clinical errors (9%), and other errors (7%). In total, errors were categorized into two generic types: "system level errors (65%) and operator-dependent errors (35%)". The number of errors was a significant difference in the studied hospitals (p Conclusions This study identified a large number of system and operator-dependent errors hampering communication of information from HIS to SEPAS. Results revealed that the same hospital information systems used in different hospitals could face dissimilar types and levels of errors when communicating with other i…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interoperability problems when transferring data between two different medical record systems can result in absent final diagnoses or national diagnostic codes, compromising the quality of the information and leading to diagnostic errors.
“Additionally, interoperability problems when transferring data between two different medical record systems can result in absent final diagnoses or national diagnostic codes, compromising the quality of the information and leading to diagnostic errors [179].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [179]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 26 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Khajouei, R., Abbasi, R., & Mirzaee, M.
- Affiliations
- Kerman University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Kashan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Abbasi, Reza
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 119
- Pages
- 47-53
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2891098420
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Information System of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences (Ardabil University of Medical Sciences) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Informatics Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences (IR.KMU.REC.1394.222)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Keywords
- hospital information systems, electronic health records, health information exchange, communication breakdown, data errors, medical errors, operator error, system errors, interoperability, Iran
- MeSH terms
- Communication Barriers, Hospital Information Systems, Hospitals, Humans, Medical Records, Medical Errors, Information Dissemination, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review