Understanding consumer acceptance of healthcare wearable devices: An integrated model of UTAUT and TTF
Abstract
Background Healthcare wearable devices (HWDs) enable continuous monitoring of consumers' health signals and have great potential to improve the efficiency and quality of healthcare. However, factors influencing consumer acceptance of HWDs are not well understood. Moreover, extant studies seem to fail to consider whether an HWD has appropriate functions to fit the requirements of consumers' healthcare activities. Objectives The objective of this study was to develop and empirically test a model by integrating the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Usage of Technology (UTAUT) and Task-Technology Fit (TTF) models to understand how consumers accept HWDs. Methods A self-administered questionnaire was designed based on validated measurement scales. Data from 406 valid samples were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Results The results indicated that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, social influence, and task-technology fit positively affected consumers' behavioral intention to use HWDs, and together accounted for 68.0 % of its variance. Both task and technology characteristics were significant determinants of task-technology fit and exerted impacts on behavioral intention through the mediating roles of task-technology fit and effort expectancy. Conclusions The key findings showed that consumer acceptance of HWDs was affected by both users' perceptions (i.e., performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions) and the task-technology fit. The theoretical and practical implications and contributions were provided for future researchers and practitioners to increase consumers' use of HWDs in their healthcare activities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The process of understanding the user's acceptance of the ERP system was done in the post-implementation stage, where the end users have already been exposed to the system.
“The process of understanding the user's acceptance of the ERP system was done in the post-implementation stage, where the end users are already been exposed to the system (Wang et al., 2020).”
From ERP Post-Implementation Phase: Deployment of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model on User Acceptance (2023) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 95 · Cited by 373
- Authors
- Wang, H., Tao, D., Yu, N., & Qu, X.
- Affiliations
- Shenzhen University (CN)
- Nanjing Forestry University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Tao, Da
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 139
- Pages
- 104156
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3018519746
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 41.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (2019A1515010863)
- Humanity and Social Science Youth foundation of Ministry of Education of China (20YJCZH146)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Keywords
- consumer acceptance, UTAUT, task-technology fit, behavioral intention, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, health monitoring, technology adoption
- MeSH terms
- Wearable Electronic Devices, Adolescent, Adult, Consumer Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Biomedical Technology, Intention, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review