The Effects of Self-Guided Interventions on Stress, Burden, and Mental Health in Caregivers of People Living with Dementia: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
Background: The number of people living with dementia continues to grow, increasing the demands on unpaid caregivers of people living with dementia. Caregiving can be emotionally and mentally distressing. In response, numerous interventions have been developed and tested to improve mental health in caregivers of people living with dementia. However, the effects of self-guided interventions on mental health in this population have remained understudied. Objective: We systematically examined the effects of self-guided interventions on stress, burden, and mental health of unpaid caregivers of people living with dementia. Design and Data Sources: A systematic review method following PRISMA guideline was used. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched using relevant search terms for the study aims from September to November 2022. The search was limited to peer-reviewed articles written in English. This review included articles that examined 1) unpaid caregivers of people living with dementia; 2) a self-guided, self-directed, or self-facilitated intervention; and 3) intervention to improve psychological or mental health as an outcome of interest. The exclusion criteria were: 1) secondary data analysis research based on an intervention study, 2) systematic reviews or meta-analyses, or 3) articles that evaluated only the acceptability or feasibility of a program. The collected data were synthesized using descriptive analysis with tabular summaries. The quality of each paper included was assessed by using JBI Quality Assessment tools. Results: A total of 16 articles and 1,182 unpaid caregivers of people living with dementia were included in this review. Stress, burden, depressive symptoms, anxiety, quality of life, self-efficacy, positive aspects of caregiving, social support, and personal relationship were measured in at least three articles. Depressive symptoms and burden were the most frequently measured outcomes. Stress was generally reduced after the interventions. However, the results of burden and mental health from each intervention were mixed and inconsistent. Interestingly, interventions that lasted less than 3 months were more likely to have better efficacy. Conclusions: Although the results of self-guided interventions are mixed, this is a potentially useful tool in improving emotional well-being for unpaid caregivers of people living with dementia due to low time burden, ease-to-access, and affordability. Future direction in intervention development should include identifying the optimal length and components of self-guided interventions and collaboration with clinicians for wider distribution to unpaid caregivers of people living with dementia. Registration: This review was not registered at the PROSPERO, and a review protocol was not prepared.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Guided interventions are more frequently used for selective and indicated prevention, whereas self-guided ones are more frequently associated with universal prevention.
“Guided interventions are more frequently used for selective and indicated prevention, whereas self-guided ones are more frequently associated with universal prevention [12,13,14,15].”
From Evolution of Primary Research Studies in Digital Interventions for Mental Well-Being Promotion from 2004 to 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on the Web of Science (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
The Introduction discusses professionally administered and self-guided interventions for dementia caregivers, but does not classify them by prevention level. The Discussion’s Strengths and limitations section says the review excluded interventions involving healthcare professionals; searches for universal, selective, and indicated prevention found no passage addressing the claimed pattern of use. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 17
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software. Published online 2022. www.covidence.org.
- Authors
- Ko, E., Wongvibul, T., Rose, K. M., & Jun, J.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ko, Eunjung
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 100141
- ISSN
- 2666-142X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11080538
- OpenAlex
- W4384025397
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ohio State University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Keywords
- self-guided intervention, informal caregivers, dementia caregiving, caregiver stress, caregiver burden, caregiver mental health, depressive symptoms, anxiety, quality of life, self-efficacy, social support, intervention duration, emotional well-being, caregiver support programs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review