The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nurses’ ethical reasoning and behaviour: A literature review
Abstract
Background Today's healthcare system requires that nurses have strong medical-technical competences and the ability to focus on the ethical dimension of care. For nurses, coping with the ethical dimension of care in practise is very difficult. Often nurses cannot act according to their own personal values and norms. This generates internal moral distress, which has a negative impact on both nurses and patients.Objectives The objective of this review is a thorough analysis of the literature about nurses' ethical practise particularly with regard to their processes of ethical reasoning and decision making and implementation of those decisions in practise.Design We conducted an extensive search of the electronic databases Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and PsycInfo for papers published between January 1988 and September 2008. A broad range of search keywords was used. The 39 selected articles had a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method design.Findings Despite the conceptual difficulties that the literature on the ethical practise of nurses suffers, in this review we understand nurses' ethical practise a complex process of reasoning, decision making, and implementation of the decision in practise. The process of decision making is more than a pure cognitive process; it is influenced by personal and contextual factors. The difficulties nurses encounter in their ethical conduct are linked to their difficult work environment. As a result, nurses often capitulate to the decisions made by others, which results in a conformist way of acting and less individually adapted care.Conclusions This review provides us with a more nuanced understanding of the way nurses reason and act in ethically difficult situations than emerged previously. If we want to support nurses in their ethical care and if we want to help them to change their conformist practises, more research is needed. Especially needed are in-depth qualitative studies that explore the experiences of nurses. Such studies could help us better understand not only how nurses reason and behave in practise but also the relationship between these two processes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“some previous studies have reported that ethical decision-making programs through purely theoretical training such as lecture method are not entirely satisfactory [4, 24].”
In the citing paper
“Nurses try to have arguments in line with other colleagues that are approved by colleagues and the institute [4, 5].”
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
(2012) · Thieves of Virtue · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9079.003.0009 · Cited by 13,453
Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf00988593 · Cited by 11,133
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development
GILLIGAN, C. (1993) · doi:10.4159/9780674037618 · Cited by 9,127
(2016) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 8,424
Principles of Biomedical Ethics.
(1984) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-100-1-168_1 · Cited by 4,559
Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., Hsu, R., Katbamna, S., Olsen, R., Smith, L., et al. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-35 · Cited by 2,289
The Philosophy of Moral Development
Hanford, J. T., & Kohlberg, L. (1982) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1385536 · Cited by 1,681
Nurses’ Reports On Hospital Care In Five Countries
Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., Sloane, D. M., Sochalski, J. A., Busse, R., Clarke, H. F., Giovannetti, P., Hunt, J., Rafferty, A. M., & Shamian, J. (2001) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.43 · Cited by 1,623
Nursing practice, the ethical issues
(1985) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/0020-7489(85)90057-4 · Cited by 1,524
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Dierckx de Casterlé, B. 1993. [Dissertation] The impact of education on ethical behaviour of nursing students. An Empirical Study (Dutch). University of Leuven, Leuven.
- Kim, Y.S., 1999. Effect of ethics education on nurses’ moral judgement [Dissertation]. University of Yonsei (in Korean).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ethical competence: An integrative review
Lechasseur, K., Caux, C., Dollé, S., & Legault, A. (2018) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/0969733016667773 · Cited by 177
What is ‘moral distress’ in nursing? A feminist empirical bioethics study
Morley, G., Bradbury‐Jones, C., & Ives, J. (2019) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/0969733019874492 · Cited by 201
Professional ethics in nursing: an integrative review
Kangasniemi, M. K., Pakkanen, P., & Korhonen, A. (2015) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12619 · Cited by 162
Cannaerts, N., Gastmans, C., & Casterlé, B. D. D. (2014) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/0969733014523166 · Cited by 152
Self-citationNurses’ decision‐making in cases of physical restraint: a synthesis of qualitative evidence
Goethals, S., de Casterlé, B. D., & Gastmans, C. (2011) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05909.x · Cited by 147
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Goethals, S., Gastmans, C., & de Casterlé, B. D.
- Affiliations
- UCLouvain (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Goethals, Sabine
- ORCID
- Gastmans, Chris
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 635-650
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048543971
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Keywords
- ethical decision-making, moral distress, ethical dilemmas, nursing work environment
- MeSH terms
- Decision Making, Ethics, Nursing, Nurses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review