CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 145Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interactive effects of nurse-experienced time pressure and burnout on patient safety: A cross-sectional survey

Teng, Ching-I, Shyu, Yea-Ing Lotus, Chiou, Wen-Ko, Fan, Hsiao-Chi, Lam, Si Man·2010·International Journal of Nursing Studies
DOI 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.04.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Global nursing shortages have exacerbated time pressure and burnout among nurses. Despite the well-established correlation between burnout and patient safety, no studies have addressed how time pressure among nurses and patient safety are related and whether burnout moderates such a relation. Objectives This study investigated how time pressure and the interaction of time pressure and nursing burnout affect patient safety. DESIGN-SETTING PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study surveyed 458 nurses in 90 units of two medical centres in northern Taiwan. Methods Nursing burnout was measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Scale. Patient safety was inversely measured by six items on frequency of adverse events. Time pressure was measured by five items. Regressions were used for the analysis. Results While the results of regression analyses suggest that time pressure did not significantly affect patient safety (beta=-.01, p>.05), time pressure and burnout had an interactive effect on patient safety (beta=-.08, p<.05). Specifically, for nurses with high burnout (n=223), time pressure was negatively related to patient safety (beta=-.10, p<.05). Conclusion Time pressure adversely affected patient safety for nurses with a high level of burnout, but not for nurses with a low level of burnout.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.04.005

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–145 of 145

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Teng, C.-I., Shyu, Y.-I. L., Chiou, W.-K., Fan, H.-C., & Lam, S. M.
Affiliations
Chang Gung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Teng, Ching-I
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
47
Issue
11
Pages
1442-1450
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.04.005
OpenAlex
W2084935014
Cited by
145
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chang Gung Medical Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
nurse burnout, patient safety, adverse events, interaction effects, nursing shortage
MeSH terms
Burnout, Professional, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Nurses, Patients, Safety Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review