Nutritional education for community dwelling older people: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Open accessAbstract
Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of nutritional education or advice on physical function, emotional health, quality of life, nutritional indices, anthropometric indicators, mortality, service use and costs of care in people over 65 years of age living at home. Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Data sources PUBMED, CINAHL, PSYCINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the National Research Register. Methods We included studies evaluating nutritional education or advice for people aged 65 and over living in their own homes that measured one or more of the following outcomes: physical function, emotional well being, service use, dietary change and other anthropometric indicators. Studies were assessed for risk of bias on six domains. Due to high heterogeneity, results were not pooled but are reported narratively. Results Twenty-three studies met our inclusion criteria. All but one of the interventions were delivered by health care professionals; ten were delivered by nurses. The review found evidence to suggest that nutritional education or advice can be used to positively influence diet and improve physical function. There was also evidence that some biochemical markers can be positively affected, although these are surrogate outcomes and are generally disease specific. Several studies indicated that complex interventions, with nutritional education as a component, also reduce depression. The evidence from this review on…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Young et al. reviewed evidence on nutritional education or advice in people over 65 years living at home; five studies had nutritional education as the sole constituent, while the rest included it as part of a more complex intervention.
“Young et al. (77) reviewed the evidence regarding the effectiveness of nutritional education or advice in people over 65 years of age living at home.Five studies (of 23) had nutritional education as the sole constituent of the program, whilst the rest included it as part of a more complex intervention.”
From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [77]
Cites
Greenhalgh, T., & Peacock, R. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68 · Cited by 2,045 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition we used ‘lateral searching’ techniques such as those recommended when searching for studies on complex interventions (Greenhalgh and Peacock, 2005).”
MethodAchieving Weight and Activity Goals Among Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Participants
The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group (2004) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1038/oby.2004.179 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
Effects of two models of nutritional intervention on homebound older adults at nutritional risk
Kretser, A. J., Voss, T., Kerr, W. W., Cavadini, C., & Friedmann, J. (2003) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1053/jada.2003.50052 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics
Volkert, D., Beck, A. M., Cederholm, T., Cruz-Jentoft, A., Hooper, L., Kiesswetter, E., Maggio, M., Raynaud-Simon, A., Sieber, C., Sobotka, L., et al. (2022) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2022.01.024 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
- Authors
- Young, K., Bunn, F., Trivedi, D., & Dickinson, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Hertfordshire (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Young, Kate
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 751-780
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117194733
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Hertfordshire
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Keywords
- nutrition education, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, physical function, depression, dietary change, quality of life, anthropometric indicators, complex interventions, nursing interventions, service utilization, cost of care
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Dietetics, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review