Cited by 80Nutrition and Health in AgingNutrition and Health StudiesGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Nutritional education for community dwelling older people: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Open access
Young, Kate, Bunn, Frances, Trivedi, Daksha, Dickinson, Angela·2011·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of nutritional education or advice on physical function, emotional health, quality of life, nutritional indices, anthropometric indicators, mortality, service use and costs of care in people over 65 years of age living at home. Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Data sources PUBMED, CINAHL, PSYCINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the National Research Register. Methods We included studies evaluating nutritional education or advice for people aged 65 and over living in their own homes that measured one or more of the following outcomes: physical function, emotional well being, service use, dietary change and other anthropometric indicators. Studies were assessed for risk of bias on six domains. Due to high heterogeneity, results were not pooled but are reported narratively. Results Twenty-three studies met our inclusion criteria. All but one of the interventions were delivered by health care professionals; ten were delivered by nurses. The review found evidence to suggest that nutritional education or advice can be used to positively influence diet and improve physical function. There was also evidence that some biochemical markers can be positively affected, although these are surrogate outcomes and are generally disease specific. Several studies indicated that complex interventions, with nutritional education as a component, also reduce depression. The evidence from this review on…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.03.007

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Young et al. reviewed evidence on nutritional education or advice in people over 65 years living at home; five studies had nutritional education as the sole constituent, while the rest included it as part of a more complex intervention.

    “Young et al. (77) reviewed the evidence regarding the effectiveness of nutritional education or advice in people over 65 years of age living at home.Five studies (of 23) had nutritional education as the sole constituent of the program, whilst the rest included it as part of a more complex intervention.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, K., Bunn, F., Trivedi, D., & Dickinson, A.
Affiliations
University of Hertfordshire (GB)
Corresponding author
Young, Kate
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
751-780
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117194733
Cited by
80
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Hertfordshire
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
nutrition education, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, physical function, depression, dietary change, quality of life, anthropometric indicators, complex interventions, nursing interventions, service utilization, cost of care
MeSH terms
Aged, Dietetics, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review