The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Negotiated dying: A grounded theory of how nurses shape withdrawal of treatment in hospital critical care units
Abstract
Background The process of withdrawal of treatment in critical care environments has created ethical and moral dilemmas in relation to end of life care in the UK and elsewhere. Common within this discourse is the differing demands made on health professionals as they strive to provide care for the dying patient and family members. Despite reports that withdrawal of treatment is a source of tension between those nurses and doctors involved in the process, the role of the nurse in facilitating withdrawal of treatment has received relatively little attention.Objectives To illustrate how differing dying trajectories impact on decision-making underpinning withdrawal of treatment processes, and what nurses do to shape withdrawal of treatment.Design Qualitative methods of enquiry using clinical vignettes and applying Charmaz's grounded theory method.Methods and settings Single audio-recorded qualitative interviews with thirteen critical care nurses from four intensive care specialities: cardiac; general; neurological and renal were carried out. Interviews were facilitated by an end-of-life vignette developed with clinical collaborators.Findings Across critical care areas four key dying trajectories were identified. These trajectories were shaped by contested boundaries associated with delayed or stalled decision-making around how withdrawal of treatment should proceed. Nurses provided end of life care (including collaborative and action-oriented skills) to shape the dying trajectory of patients so as to satisfy the wishes of the patient and family, and their own professional aims.Conclusions Differing views as to when withdrawal of treatment should commence and how it should be operationalised appeared to be underpinned by the requirements of the role that health professionals fulfil, with doctors focusing on making withdrawal of treatment decisions, and nurse's being tasked with operationalising the processes that constitute it. Multidisciplinary teams need a 'shared' understanding of each other's roles, responsibilities, aims, and motivations when planning and implementing the dying trajectory of withdrawal of treatment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Quite frequently, studies that adopt the criterion of saturation propose at the same time a prior sample size (e.g. McNulty et al. 2015; Long-Sutehall et al. 2011).”
From Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization (2018) · cites this paper as Long-Sutehall et al. 2011
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 66
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Allen, 1997, The nursing-medical boundary: a negotiated order?, Sociology of Health and Illness, 19, 498
- Bach, 2009, Nursing roles in end-of-life decision making in critical care settings, Western Journal of Nursing Research, 31, 496, 10.1177/0193945908331178 · DOI
- Benbenishty, 2006, Nurse involvement in end-of-life decision making: the ETHICUS study, Intensive Care Medicine, 32, 129, 10.1007/s00134-005-2864-1 · DOI
- Breen, 2001, Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 283, 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.00419.x · DOI
- Cassell, 2003, Surgeons, intensivists, and the covenant of care: administrative models and values affecting care at the end of life, Critical Care Medicine, 31, 1551, 10.1097/00003246-200305000-00039 · DOI
- Cook, 2006, Understanding and changing attitudes toward withdrawal and withholding of life support in the intensive care unit, Critical Care Medicine, 34, S317, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000237042.11330.A9 · DOI
- Coombs, 2010, International dialogue on End of Life: challenges in the UK and USA, Nursing in Critical Care, 15, 234, 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2010.00408.x · DOI
- Festic, 2011, Perspectives of physicians and nurses regarding end-of-life care in the intensive care unit, Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
- Frick, 2003, Medical futility: predicting outcome of intensive care unit patients by nurses and doctors—a prospective comparative study, Critical Care Medicine, 31, 456, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000049945.69373.7C · DOI
- Harvey, 1997, The technological regulation of death: with reference to the technological regulation of birth, Sociology, 31, 719, 10.1177/0038038597031004005 · DOI
- Ho, 2005, The involvement of intensive care nurses in end-of-life decisions: a nationwide survey, Intensive Care Medicine, 31, 668, 10.1007/s00134-005-2613-5 · DOI
- Hodde, 2004, Factors associated with nurse assessment of the quality of death and dying in the intensive care unit, Critical Care Medicine, 32, 1648, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000133018.60866.5F · DOI
- Hughes, 1998, Considering the vignette technique and its application to a study of drug injecting and HIV risk and safer behaviour, Sociology of Health and Illness, 20, 381, 10.1111/1467-9566.00107 · DOI · Paper page
- Kirchhoff, 2000, Intensive care nurses’ experiences with end-of-life care, American Journal of Critical Care, 9, 36, 10.4037/ajcc2000.9.1.36 · DOI
- Long, 2008, Conflict rationalization: how family members cope with a diagnosis of brain stem death, Social Science & Medicine, 67, 253, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.039 · DOI
- Pattison, 2011, End of life in critical care: an emphasis on care, Nursing in Critical Care, 16, 113, 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2011.00459.x · DOI
- Puntillo, 2006, Communication between physicians and nurses as a target for improving end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: challenges and opportunities for moving forward, Critical Care Medicine, 34, S332, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000237047.31376.28 · DOI
- Robichaux, 2006, Practice of expert critical care nurses in situations of prognostic conflict at the end of life, American Journal of Critical Care, 15, 480, 10.4037/ajcc2006.15.5.480 · DOI
- Svensson, 1996, The interplay between doctors and nurses—a negotiated order perspective, Sociology of Health and Illness, 18, 379, 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10934735 · DOI
- Truog, 2008, Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a consensus statement by the American College of Critical Care Medicine, Critical Care Medicine, 36, 953, 10.1097/CCM.0B013E3181659096 · DOI
- Wunsch, 2005, End-of-life decisions: a cohort study of the withdrawal of all active treatment in intensive care units in the United Kingdom, Intensive Medical Care, 31, 23
- Varcoe, 2004, Ethical practice in nursing: working the in-betweens, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45, 316, 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02892.x · DOI
- Yaguchi, 2005, International differences in end-of-life attitudes in the intensive care unit, Archives of Internal Medicine, 165, 1970, 10.1001/archinte.165.17.1970 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Long-Sutehall, T., Willis, H., Palmer, R., Ugboma, D., Addington-Hall, J., & Coombs, M.
- Affiliations
- Queen Alexandra Hospital (GB)
- University of Southampton (GB)
- ORCID
- Coombs, Maureen
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1466-1474
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061361998
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Keywords
- treatment withdrawal, end-of-life care, critical care nursing, dying trajectories, nursing role, multidisciplinary decision-making, intensive care unit, nurse-physician relationship, family involvement, clinical ethics, nursing practice
- MeSH terms
- Critical Care, Death, Humans, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Negotiating
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Negotiated dying: A grounded theory of how nurses shape withdrawal of treatment in hospital critical care units. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.06.003
- The paper
- Long-Sutehall, T., Willis, H., Palmer, R., Ugboma, D., Addington-Hall, J., & Coombs, M. (2011). Negotiated dying: A grounded theory of how nurses shape withdrawal of treatment in hospital critical care units. International Journal of Nursing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.06.003
