Cited by 175Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

A comparative qualitative analysis of stories of spousal caregivers of people with dementia: Negative, ambivalent, and positive experiences

Shim, Bomin, Barroso, Julie, Davis, Linda L.·2012·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Background Caregivers of people with dementia describe a wide spectrum of caregiving experiences, from very negative to very positive. Previous research reveals that differences exist, but how or why the experiences differ has not been well addressed. Objective The purpose of this study was to explore how the experiences of spousal caregivers of people with dementia differ. Methods This study was a secondary analysis of interviews collected from a longitudinal caregiver skill training intervention for caregivers of those with degenerative diseases (parent study). For the purpose of this analysis, 57 interviews from 21 spousal caregivers of people with dementia in the control group of the parent study were analyzed. The interviews from the parent study were collected at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months post-enrollment. Results Three groups of caregivers were identified based on how they described their experience; a negative group, an ambivalent group and a positive group. The negative group described both past and present relationships with their spouse in negative terms. These caregivers expressed no positives in caregiving. Their focus was on their own unmet needs rather than their spouses' needs. These caregivers reported significant caregiving burden. The ambivalent group reported that the relationship they had with the spouse was lost, but they still described satisfaction in being able to care for the spouse. They described mixed emotions about caregiving and had difficulty accepting that their partners could no longer reciprocate in the relationship. The positive group described both their past and present relationship with the care recipient in loving terms. They focused on aspects of the relationship they still had, rather than what had been lost. They expressed satisfaction with caregiving, were other-focused, and not highly burdened by caregiving. They understood that their partner could not reciprocate, and expected nothing in return. Descriptions of the positive group suggest target areas for caregiver interventions. Conclusion Spousal caregivers of people with dementia can be encouraged toward more positive caregiving experiences through empathy-building interventions and enhanced understanding and acceptance of changes in the care recipient.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 175

Authors
Shim, B., Barroso, J., & Davis, L. L.
Affiliations
  • Seattle Pacific University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
220-229
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050534941
Cited by
175
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01008285)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR008285)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
spousal caregivers, dementia, caregiver experiences, caregiver burden, caregiver satisfaction, ambivalence, caregiver interventions, caregiver needs, acceptance of change
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Caregivers, Spouses, Narration, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review