An exploration of the hydration care of older people: A qualitative study
Open accessAbstract
Background Older adults are more susceptible to water imbalance and ensuring they drink sufficiently is a complex and challenging issue for nurses. The factors that promote adequate hydration and the barriers which prevent older people from drinking are not well understood. Objective This study aimed to understand the complexity of issues associated with the hydration and hydration care of older people. Design A qualitative study using multiple methods. Settings Two healthcare sites providing care for older people in the South West of England: a hospital ward in a major hospital and a care home providing personal and nursing care. Participants Twenty-one older people aged 68-96 years, were recruited to the study from the hospital ward and care home. The inclusion criteria for older people to participate were men or women aged 65 years and over and the exclusion criteria were being unable to provide informed consent, or being too ill or distressed to take part in the study. The staff participants of nurses and health care assistants totalled 21. The inclusion criterion for staff was any nurse or health care assistant providing hydration care. Seven friends or relatives participated by making anonymous comments via a suggestion box available to all friends and relatives. Methods Data were collected via interviews with older people, focus group discussions involving staff, suggestion box comments made by friends and relatives and twelve hours observation of hydration practice. T…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fluid intake may be reduced voluntarily because of issues about getting to the toilet and continence.
“Fluid intake may also be reduced voluntarily, e.g. because of issues about getting to the toilet and continence (8,226,253).”
From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [253]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 66 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Godfrey, H., Cloete, J., Dymond, E., & Long, A.
- Affiliations
- University of the West of England (GB)
- North Bristol NHS Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Godfrey, Helen
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1200-1211
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989307433
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.uwe.ac.uk
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- North Bristol NHS Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Keywords
- older adults, water imbalance, drinking behavior, nurses, healthcare assistants, care homes, hospital wards, social interaction, fluid intake
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dehydration, Drinking Behavior, England, Female, Fluid Therapy, Hospitals, Public, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review