Group-level impact of work environment dimensions on burnout experiences among nurses: A multivariate multilevel probit model
Open accessAbstract
Background Nurses' work environments are associated with burnout experiences among nurses. The RN4CAST project provides data on these constructs within a four-level structure (nurse, nursing unit, hospital, and country), implying more complicated multilevel analysis strategies than have been used in previous efforts studying this relationship. Objectives First, to explore and investigate the effect of the nursing unit, hospital, and country level variability on the relationship between dimensions of nurses' work environment and dimensions of burnout. Second, to explore the significance of the nursing unit, hospital, and country level variability among the burnout dimensions. Design Data from the RN4CAST project were available from a cross-sectional survey among 23,446 nurses in 2087 nursing units in 352 hospitals in 11 countries. Methods Nurse-reported information on their work environment (managerial support for nursing, doctor-nurse collegial relations, and promotion of care quality) and burnout experiences (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and personal accomplishment) were available. We specified ecological measures of the nurse work environment dimensions at the three organizational levels and combined these with individual-level outcomes within a series of multilevel statistical models. The final model was a multivariate multilevel probit model in which we modeled the work environment and burnout dimensions jointly. Results Doctor-nurse collegial relations affected all burnout dimensions, but at the unit level only. For the dimension of promotion of care quality, the effect of the ecological exposure on burnout was pronounced at both the nursing unit and the hospital level for all three burnout dimensions. Findings for the dimensions of managerial support for nursing were ambiguous. Conclusion Nurse work environment dynamics are related to nurses' burnout experiences at both the nursing unit and the hospital level. This implies that both hospital-wide and unit-specific interventions should be considered to achieve excellent work environments. The correlation structure among the three burnout outcomes varies across countries, but is stable between hospitals within countries and between nursing units within hospitals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Support from supervisor or leader is a protective factor from Emotional Exhaustion only in two studies.
“two studies reported it is a protective factor from Emotional Exhaustion only [58, 83]”
From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [83]
Having negative relationships with physicians is associated with all MBI dimensions.
“In two studies, having negative relationships with physicians was associated with all MBI dimensions [77, 83]”
From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [83]
Foundations for quality of care are associated with all MBI dimensions.
“but in another study, foundations for quality of care were associated with all MBI dimensions [83]”
From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [83]
Cites
General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations
Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787 · Cited by 6,045 · see citing works
Early predictors of job burnout and engagement.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.498 · Cited by 2,397 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review.
Dall’Ora, C., Ball, J., Reinius, M., & Griffiths, P. (2020) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/s12960-020-00469-9 · Cited by 1,181 · see citing works
Leineweber, C., Westerlund, H., Chungkham, H. S., Lindqvist, R., Runesdotter, S., & Tishelman, C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096991 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
- Authors
- Li, B., Bruyneel, L., Sermeus, W., Van den Heede, K., Matawie, K., Aiken, L., & Lesaffre, E.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Western Sydney University (AU)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Baoyue
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281-291
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125307566
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 27.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- zenodo.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Seventh Framework Programme (223468)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Keywords
- nurse burnout, work environment, nurses, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, RN4CAST
- MeSH terms
- Burnout, Professional, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Nursing Staff, Multivariate Analysis, Workplace
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review