Why health visiting? Examining the potential public health benefits from health visiting practice within a universal service: A narrative review of the literature
Abstract
Introduction There is increasing international interest in universal, health promoting services for pregnancy and the first three years of life and the concept of proportionate universalism. Drawing on a narrative review of literature, this paper explores mechanisms by which such services might contribute to health improvement and reducing health inequalities. Objectives Through a narrative review of empirical literature, to identify: (1) What are the key components of health visiting practice? (2) How are they reflected in implementing the universal service/provision envisaged in the English Health Visitor Implementation Plan (HVIP)? Design The paper draws upon a scoping study and narrative review. Review methods We used three complementary approaches to search the widely dispersed literature: (1) broad, general search, (2) structured search, using topic-specific search terms, (3) seminal paper search. Our key inclusion criterion was information about health visiting practice. We included empirical papers from United Kingdom (UK) from 2004 to February 2012 and older seminal papers identified in search (3), identifying a total of 348 papers for inclusion. A thematic content analysis compared the older (up to 2003) with more recent research (2004 onwards). Results The analysis revealed health visiting practice as potentially characterized by a particular 'orientation to practice.' This embodied the values, skills and attitudes needed to deliver universal health visiting services through salutogenesis (health creation), person-centredness (human valuing) and viewing the person in situation (human ecology). Research about health visiting actions focuses on home visiting, needs assessment and parent-health visitor relationships. The detailed description of health visitors' skills, attitudes, values, and their application in practice, provides an explanation of how universal provision can potentially help to promote health and shift the social gradient of health inequalities. Conclusions Identification of needs across an undifferentiated, universal caseload, combined with an outreach style that enhances uptake of needed services and appropriate health or parenting information, creates opportunities for parents who may otherwise have remained unaware of, or unwilling to engage with such provision. There is a lack of evaluative research about health visiting practice, service organization or universal health visiting as potential mechanisms for promoting health and reducing health inequalities. This paper offers a potential foundation for such research in future.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reviews included did not identify interventions following the objective of flattening the social gradient.
“Reviews included also did not identify interventions following this objective ?(54-56).”
From Theoretical and practical challenges of proportionate universalism: a review (2020) · cites this paper as [54]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 138 · Cited by 109
- Authors
- Cowley, S., Whittaker, K., Malone, M., Donetto, S., Grigulis, A., & Maben, J.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- University of Lancashire (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cowley, Sarah
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 465-480
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976968462
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 138
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (016/0058)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
- Keywords
- health visiting, universal health services, proportionate universalism, health disparities, salutogenesis, person-centred care, human ecology, home visiting, needs assessment, early childhood health promotion, social gradient
- MeSH terms
- United Kingdom, Social Justice, Public Health Practice, Nurses, Community Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review