The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration in healthcare: A systematic review of the qualitative research
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration have become important components of a well-functioning healthcare system, all the more so given limited financial resources, aging populations, and comorbid chronic diseases. The nursing role in working alongside other healthcare professionals is critical. By their leadership, nurses can create a culture that encourages values and role models that favour collaborative work within a team context. OBJECTIVES: To clarify the specific features of conceptual frameworks of interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration in the healthcare field. This review, accordingly, offers insights into the key challenges facing policymakers, managers, healthcare professionals, and nurse leaders in planning, implementing, or evaluating interprofessional collaboration. DESIGN: This systematic review of qualitative research is based on the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology for conducting synthesis. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane, JBI, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Sociological Abstract, PsycInfo, and ProQuest were searched, using terms such as professionals, organizations, collaboration, and frameworks. METHODS: Qualitative studies of all research design types describing a conceptual framework of interprofessional or interorganizational collaboration in the healthcare field were included. They had to be written in French or English and published in the ten years between 2004 and 2014. RESULTS: Sixteen qualitative articles were included in the synthesis. Several concepts were found to be common to interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration, such as communication, trust, respect, mutual acquaintanceship, power, patient-centredness, task characteristics, and environment. Other concepts are of particular importance either to interorganizational collaboration, such as the need for formalization and the need for professional role clarification, or to interprofessional collaboration, such as the role of individuals and team identity. Promoting interorganizational collaboration was found to face greater challenges, such as achieving a sense of belonging among professionals when differences exist between corporate cultures, geographical distance, the multitude of processes, and formal paths of communication. CONCLUSIONS: This review sets a direction to follow for implementing changes that meet the challenge of a changing healthcare system and the transition towards non-institutional care. It also shows that collaboration between nurses and healthcare professionals from different healthcare organizations is still poorly explored. This is a major limitation in the existing scientific literature, especially given the potential role that could be played by nurses in enhancing interorganizational collaboration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Barnett, K., Mercer, S. W., Norbury, M., Watt, G., Wyke, S., & Guthrie, B. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60240-2 · Cited by 6,972
Cited by
Wei, H., Horns, P., Sears, S. F., Huang, K., Smith, C. M., & Wei, T. L. (2022) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820.2021.1973975 · Cited by 310
Kackin, O., Ciydem, E., Aci, O. S., & Kutlu, F. Y. (2021) · International Journal of Social Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0020764020942788 · Cited by 281
Allied health transdisciplinary models of care in hospital settings: a scoping review
Martin, A. K., Green, T. L., McCarthy, A. L., Sowa, P. M., & Laakso, E.-L. (2023) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820.2022.2038552 · Cited by 39
Lundereng, E. D., Dihle, A., & Steindal, S. A. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.15371 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Karam, M., Brault, I., Van Durme, T., & Macq, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 79
- Pages
- 70-83
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2767741183
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration in healthcare: A systematic review of the qualitative research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.002
- The paper
- Karam, M., Brault, I., Van Durme, T., & Macq, J. (2018). Comparing interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration in healthcare: A systematic review of the qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.