Cited by 79Nursing Roles and PracticesNursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

The Relationship Between Specialty Nurse Certification and Patient, Nurse and Organizational Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Whitehead, Lisa, Ghosh, Manonita, Walker, Deborah Kirk, Bloxsome, Dianne, Vafeas, Caroline, Wilkinson, Anne·2019·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Objectives To review the current evidence on the relationship between specialty nurse certification and outcomes. Design A structured and comprehensive systematic review was undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework to include both published research studies and expert opinion papers. Data sources Four electronic databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsychINFO were searched between 2000 and 2018. The search for expert opinion papers included nursing organizations, OaLster, Grey Literature Report, and The National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators. Review methods The records generated through the search were exported to EndNote X8 and duplicates were removed. Title and abstracts of the records were screened by three reviewers for eligibility using the selection criteria. In the absence of an abstract, records were retained for full text review. Full text assessment of each paper was conducted by two reviewers with a third referee, if necessary, to review any discrepancies. In the case of multiple articles drawing on one set of primary data, only one article was included. A review of each article was completed using the JBI Quality Appraisal checklists to assess internal and external reliability and validity. Both quality appraisal and data extraction were conducted by the review team independently and were validated by one other member of the team. Discrepancies were resolved through rigorous discussion between the reviewers. Results Forty one original research studies were included in the final analysis of the literature. The findings from the included articles were synthesized into three major categories and subsequent sub-categories: Patient outcomes, nurse outcomes and organizational outcomes. Twenty seven findings contributed to the sub-category of specialty nurse certification and patient outcomes. Patient outcomes were further classified into nurse sensitive outcomes, patient mortality and patient satisfaction. Fifty-four findings related to nurse outcomes with the sub-categories: personal and professional factors, knowledge and skills, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, empowerment and confidence. Six findings related to organizational benefits: including the sub-categories of nursing turnover and vacancy rates, perception of healthcare, and costs to the organization. Conclusions The current model risks driving further proliferation of specialty certifications and certifying organizations without questioning the assumptions underlying the goals of certification. The challenges of measuring impact and the cost and value to individual nurses and healthcare organizations are key areas for consideration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Whitehead et al. revealed the critical role of specialist nurses in outcomes related to nursing-sensitive indicators, including pressure ulcers, infection rates, and falls.

    “Whitehead et al. revealed the critical role of specialist nurses in outcomes related to nursing‐sensitive indicators, including pressure ulcers, infection rates, and falls [23].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitehead, L., Ghosh, M., Walker, D. K., Bloxsome, D., Vafeas, C., & Wilkinson, A.
Affiliations
Edith Cowan University (AU)
Corresponding author
Whitehead, Lisa
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
93
Pages
1-11
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913706743
Cited by
79
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2025-11-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edith Cowan University Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Hospice and Palliative Nurses Foundation (Sub/76484)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
nurse-sensitive outcomes, patient outcomes, nursing outcomes, organizational outcomes, patient satisfaction, patient mortality, nurse turnover, nursing satisfaction, nurse empowerment, certification costs, nursing competencies
MeSH terms
Certification, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Nursing Staff, Patients, Specialties, Nursing, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review