Effectiveness of motivational interviewing in enhancing cancer screening uptake amongst average-risk individuals: A systematic review
Abstract
Background Although cancer is a worldwide public health problem, it can be detected early and prevented through cancer screening. Recommendations for screening methods and screening intervals are currently available for several types of cancer. However, not all average-risk individuals are motivated to undergo cancer screening. Objectives To examine the effectiveness of motivational interviewing that targets average-risk individuals regarding their cancer screening intention and uptake and to provide recommendations for the content and format of motivational interviewing based on the existing evidence. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using four databases and a manual search. A combination of keywords including 'motivational interviewing', 'cancer screening', 'screening intention' and 'screening uptake' were used to identify relevant articles. Only randomised controlled trials that examined the effects of motivational interviewing amongst average-risk individuals were included in the review. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to appraise the methodological quality of the selected articles. The findings were summarised in narrative and tabular formats. Results Six randomised controlled trials that used motivational interviewing to enhance cancer screening uptake or intention were included in the review. The findings show that motivational interviewing that used a face-to-face and telephone-based approach or were used together with a tailored or reminde…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The mixed findings on motivational interviewing for CRC might relate to the way that motivational interviewing was conducted, not to the cancer type.
“The mixed findings might relate to the way that motivational interviewing was conducted, not to the cancer type [49].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [49]
Motivational interviewing, delivered face-to-face or by telephone, was effective in increasing BC and CC screening, but results for CRC were mixed.
“A systematic review of effectiveness of motivational interviewing to promote cancer screening found that using motivational interviewing either face-to-face or on the telephone was effective in increasing BC and CC screening but with mixed results for CRC [49].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [49]
Cites
Lundahl, B., Moleni, T., Burke, B. L., Butters, R., Tollefson, D., Butler, C., & Rollnick, S. (2013) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.012 · Cited by 909 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review
Palsola, M., Likki, T., Snijders, V., Corbex, M., Lasierra, L., & Curtis, B. (2026) · Glasnik javnog zdravlja · doi:10.5937/serbjph2601086p
- Authors
- Chan, D. N. S., & So, W. K. W.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Chan, Dorothy N.S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 113
- Pages
- 103786
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3090097454
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- motivational interviewing, cancer screening uptake, average-risk population, screening intention, breast cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, telephone-delivered intervention, reminder letters, personalized interventions, online intervention
- MeSH terms
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Communication, Female, Humans, Telephone, Early Detection of Cancer, Motivational Interviewing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review