Cited by 39Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareWomen's cancer prevention and management

Effectiveness of motivational interviewing in enhancing cancer screening uptake amongst average-risk individuals: A systematic review

Chan, Dorothy N.S., So, Winnie K.W.·2021·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Background Although cancer is a worldwide public health problem, it can be detected early and prevented through cancer screening. Recommendations for screening methods and screening intervals are currently available for several types of cancer. However, not all average-risk individuals are motivated to undergo cancer screening. Objectives To examine the effectiveness of motivational interviewing that targets average-risk individuals regarding their cancer screening intention and uptake and to provide recommendations for the content and format of motivational interviewing based on the existing evidence. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using four databases and a manual search. A combination of keywords including 'motivational interviewing', 'cancer screening', 'screening intention' and 'screening uptake' were used to identify relevant articles. Only randomised controlled trials that examined the effects of motivational interviewing amongst average-risk individuals were included in the review. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to appraise the methodological quality of the selected articles. The findings were summarised in narrative and tabular formats. Results Six randomised controlled trials that used motivational interviewing to enhance cancer screening uptake or intention were included in the review. The findings show that motivational interviewing that used a face-to-face and telephone-based approach or were used together with a tailored or reminde…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103786

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mixed findings on motivational interviewing for CRC might relate to the way that motivational interviewing was conducted, not to the cancer type.

    “The mixed findings might relate to the way that motivational interviewing was conducted, not to the cancer type [49].”
  • Motivational interviewing, delivered face-to-face or by telephone, was effective in increasing BC and CC screening, but results for CRC were mixed.

    “A systematic review of effectiveness of motivational interviewing to promote cancer screening found that using motivational interviewing either face-to-face or on the telephone was effective in increasing BC and CC screening but with mixed results for CRC [49].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, D. N. S., & So, W. K. W.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Chan, Dorothy N.S.
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
113
Pages
103786
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3090097454
Cited by
39
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
motivational interviewing, cancer screening uptake, average-risk population, screening intention, breast cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, telephone-delivered intervention, reminder letters, personalized interventions, online intervention
MeSH terms
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Communication, Female, Humans, Telephone, Early Detection of Cancer, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review