Cited by 20Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnesthesia and Pain ManagementMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

A systematic review of the association between postpartum depression and neuraxial labor analgesia

Orbach-Zinger, S., Heesen, M., Grigoriadis, S., Heesen, P., Halpern, S.·2021·International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia

Abstract

Background Postpartum depression (PPD) is the most common complication after childbirth, affecting 10-15% of women. It is associated with serious long-term consequences for the mother and family. Whether or not neuraxial labor analgesia mitigates the risk is uncertain and controversial. The purpose of this review was to summarize studies investigating the association between neuraxial labor analgesia and the incidence of PPD. Methods A systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies reporting the incidence of PPD among parturients who received neuraxial analgesia compared with non-neuraxial or no analgesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of PPD between 5 and 12 weeks' postpartum. Depression was diagnosed using a cutoff score of ≥10 on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale, a validated screening tool. The risk of bias of each study was evaluated, and odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals calculated from raw data or reported as adjusted odds ratios. Results Eleven observational studies involving 5717 patients were included. Three studies had a critical risk, three a serious risk, and five a moderate risk of bias. Two studies reported significantly lower odds for PPD associated with neuraxial analgesia compared with non-neuraxial or no analgesia, whereas the odds ratios in the remaining nine studies were not significantly different. Conclusions Our systematic review did not find compelling evidence for an association between PPD and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.10.004

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orbach-Zinger, S., Heesen, M., Grigoriadis, S., Heesen, P., & Halpern, S.
Affiliations
  • Kantonsspital Baden (CH)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
45
Pages
142-149
ISSN
0959-289X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093887698
Cited by
20
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
postpartum depression, neuraxial labor analgesia, epidural analgesia, labor analgesia, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, childbirth complications
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Analgesia, Epidural, Analgesia, Obstetrical, Depression, Postpartum, Parturition, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review