Cited by 7Head and Neck AnomaliesLymphadenopathy Diagnosis and AnalysisOtolaryngology and Infectious Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pattern of acquired neck masses in a Kenyan paediatric population

Ayugi, J., Ogengo, J., Macharia, I., Olabu, B.·2011·International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract

Acquired paediatric neck masses constitute a diagnostic challenge. Their pattern is important in formulating management protocol. Reports from developing countries including Kenya are scarce. This study describes the causes, location, clinical features and gender distribution of these masses in a Kenyan paediatric population. This prospective cross-sectional study was carried out in a regional Eastern and Central African referral centre in Kenya. Children aged 16 years and below with neck masses, who presented to various clinics and wards in a 5 month period were examined. One hundred and eighty four of 235 masses (78%) were acquired. Inflammatory cases were the most common (64%), followed by malignant neoplasm (32%). The most common inflammatory cases were abscesses, reactive lymphadenopathy and tuberculous adenitis. They mainly involved upper cervical and submandibular lymph nodes and were more prevalent in those aged less than 4 years. Lymphomas were the most common malignant masses (42%). Malignant masses were widespread in location; non-tender, and most frequent in those aged 4-8 years. In conclusion, inflammatory conditions consistent with upper airway infection cause most acquired paediatric neck masses, but malignant neoplasms constitute a significant proportion. Prudent management of infection and early confirmation of diagnosis are recommended.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.019

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Youn, 2005, Clinical evaluation of tissue biopsy for children with neck mass; a single centre study, Korean J Paediatr, 48, 839

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Ayugi, J., Ogengo, J., Macharia, I., & Olabu, B.
Affiliations
University of Nairobi (KE)
Corresponding author
Ayugi, J.
Venue
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
384-387
ISSN
0901-5027 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998748478
Cited by
7
References
16
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Head and Neck Anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Otolaryngology and Infectious Diseases
Keywords
lymphoma, lymphadenopathy, submandibular lymph nodes, tuberculous lymphadenitis, abscess, upper respiratory tract infection, Kenya
MeSH terms
Abscess, Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Developing Countries, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Infant, Kenya, Lymphadenitis, Male, Neck, Prospective Studies, Respiratory Tract Infections, Tuberculosis, Lymph Node, Lymphoma, AIDS-Related

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review