Psychology and low back pain
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the context of chronic pain, ACT targets ineffective control and avoidance strategies by fostering techniques that lead to psychological resilience.
“In the context of chronic pain, Acceptance and Com mitment Therapy (ACT) targets ineffective control and avoidance strategies by fostering techniques that lead to psychological resilience [11].”
From Effect of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy On Pain-Related Anxiety and Cognitive Emotion Regulation in Breast Cancer Patients: A Clinical Trail (2020) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Bogduk, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Bogduk, Nikolai
- ORCID
- Bogduk, Nikolai
- Venue
- International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 49-53
- ISSN
- 1746-0689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086089531
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International journal of osteopathic medicine (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Keywords
- low back pain, psychosocial factors, fear-avoidance beliefs, fear-avoidance model, chronic pain, risk factors, prognostic factors, depression, anxiety, distress, somatization, catastrophizing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
