Cited by 8Respiratory and Cough-Related ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Assessment of the measurement tools of dysfunctional breathing

Courtney, Rosalba, Cohen, Marc·2006·International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijosm.2006.01.012

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Courtney, R., & Cohen, M.
Affiliations
RMIT University (AU)
Venue
International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
34
ISSN
1746-0689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089865202
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International journal of osteopathic medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
dysfunctional breathing, hypocapnia, carbon dioxide levels, capnometry, breath holding time, Nijmegen questionnaire, heart rate variability coherence, breathing pattern, fibromyalgia, chronic pain, musculoskeletal disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review