Cited by 31Musculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationInnovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Comparison of the manual assessment of respiratory motion (MARM) and the HI lo breathing assessment in determining a simulated breathing pattern

Courtney, Rosalba, Cohen, Marc, Reece, John·2009·International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijosm.2008.10.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Focus group discussions describe how other assessment tools including the HiLo assessment, BH and other Musculo-skeletal assessments are well used.

    “Additionally, discussions in the FG describe how other assessment tools including the HiLo 33 assessment, BH and other Musculo-­ skeletal assessments are well used.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 31

Authors
Courtney, R., Cohen, M., & Reece, J.
Affiliations
RMIT University (AU)
Corresponding author
Courtney, Rosalba
Venue
International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
86-91
ISSN
1746-0689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091617027
Cited by
31
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International journal of osteopathic medicine (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • RMIT University
  • Victoria University
  • Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
paradoxical breathing, diaphragmatic breathing, thoracic breathing, osteopathic medical education, osteopathic medical students, examiner experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review