Comparison of the manual assessment of respiratory motion (MARM) and the HI lo breathing assessment in determining a simulated breathing pattern
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Focus group discussions describe how other assessment tools including the HiLo assessment, BH and other Musculo-skeletal assessments are well used.
“Additionally, discussions in the FG describe how other assessment tools including the HiLo 33 assessment, BH and other Musculo- skeletal assessments are well used.”
From Physiotherapy assessment of breathing pattern disorder: a qualitative evaluation (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- Courtney, R., Cohen, M., & Reece, J.
- Affiliations
- RMIT University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Courtney, Rosalba
- Venue
- International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 86-91
- ISSN
- 1746-0689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091617027
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International journal of osteopathic medicine (publishedVersion)
- RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- RMIT University
- Victoria University
- Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- paradoxical breathing, diaphragmatic breathing, thoracic breathing, osteopathic medical education, osteopathic medical students, examiner experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review