The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The zoonotic transmission of Giardia and Cryptosporidium
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Giardia and Cryptosporidium join the ‘Neglected Diseases Initiative’
Savioli, L., Smith, H., & Thompson, A. (2006) · Trends in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.pt.2006.02.015 · Cited by 888
XIAO, L., & FAYER, R. (2008) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.03.006 · Cited by 517
Enteric Protozoa in the Developed World: a Public Health Perspective
Fletcher, S. M., Stark, D., Harkness, J., & Ellis, J. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.05038-11 · Cited by 434
The socioeconomic burden of parasitic zoonoses: Global trends
Torgerson, P. R., & Macpherson, C. N. L. (2011) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.07.017 · Cited by 404
Zoonotic parasites in fecal samples and fur from dogs and cats in The Netherlands
Overgaauw, P. A. M., van Zutphen, L., Hoek, D., Yaya, F. O., Roelfsema, J., Pinelli, E., van Knapen, F., & Kortbeek, L. M. (2009) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.03.044 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Hunter, P. R., & Thompson, R. C. A.
- Venue
- International Journal for Parasitology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 11-12
- Pages
- 1181-1190
- ISSN
- 0020-7519 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077844629
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The zoonotic transmission of Giardia and Cryptosporidium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.009
- The paper
- Hunter, P. R., & Thompson, R. C. A. (2005). The zoonotic transmission of Giardia and Cryptosporidium. International Journal for Parasitology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
