The technology life cycle: Conceptualization and managerial implications
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CE-I4.0 integration will require a focus on innovative activities, as well as emerging digital technologies.
“This is also important in the context of the CE [107] as CE-I4.0 integration will require a focus on innovative activities, as well as emerging digital technologies [120].”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [107]
The macro model of TLC incorporates technological discontinuity, a breakthrough innovation affecting products and/or processes.
“The macro model of TLC incorporates technological discontinuity (a breakthrough innovation which affects both products and/or processes) [107].”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [107]
TLC has been highlighted in literature as 'confused' and incomplete, a misunderstanding attributed to similarities between industry life cycle, product life cycle, and technology life cycle.
“Furthermore, TLC has been highlighted in literature as 'confused' and incomplete' [107], a misunderstanding which has been attributed to the similarities between the terms ' industry life cycle ', ' product life cycle ', and ' technology life cycle '.”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [107]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 91 · Cited by 170
- Authors
- Taylor, M., & Taylor, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Bradford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, Margaret
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 541-553
- ISSN
- 0925-5273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046677485
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 9.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Production Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Bradford Scholars (University of Bradford) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Technology Assessment and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- technology life cycle, technology generation, technological paradigms, dominant design, technological discontinuity, industry life cycle, product life cycle, technology application, technology management, R&D management, technological progress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
